CVE-2025-70974

CRITICALPre-NVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-01-09. The CNA's CVSS baseline 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-1694 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jm7w-5684-pvh8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Fastjson before 1.2.48 mishandles autoType because, when an @type key is in a JSON document, and the value of that key is the name of a Java class, there may be calls to certain public methods of that class. Depending on the behavior of those methods, there may be JNDI injection with an attacker-supplied payload located elsewhere in that JSON document. This was exploited in the wild in 2023 through 2025. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-18349. Also, a later bypass is covered by CVE-2022-25845.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
76
EG Risk 76/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
54th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 9, 2026

Last Modified

July 15, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Androxgh0st Continues Exploitation: Operators Compromise a US University For Hosting C2 Logger | CloudSEK

https://www.cloudsek.com/blog/androxgh0st-continues-exploitation-operators-compromise-a-us-university-for-hosting-c2-logger
Web page

vulhub/fastjson/1.2.47-rce at master · vulhub/vulhub · GitHub

https://github.com/vulhub/vulhub/tree/master/fastjson/1.2.47-rce
Web page

Fastjson 远程代码执行漏洞 - 知道创宇 Seebug 漏洞平台

https://www.seebug.org/vuldb/ssvid-98020
Web page

Comparing 1.2.47...1.2.48 · alibaba/fastjson · GitHub

https://github.com/alibaba/fastjson/compare/1.2.47...1.2.48
Red Hat

2428203 – (CVE-2025-70974) CVE-2025-70974 fastjson: Fastjson: Remote Code Execution via JNDI Injection due to autoType mishandling

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2428203
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

cve-details

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-70974

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-70974(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
mavencom.alibaba:fastjson @ 1.2.48 (fixes < 1.2.48)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
com.alibaba:fastjson1.1.15 ... 1.2.9 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 1.2.48: fixed in 1.2.48
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 56× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 237 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 138 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jm7w-5684-pvh8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  3. 2026-11-01 08:01 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-11-01 06:11 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  6. 2026-10-31 05:52 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  8. 2026-10-30 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  10. 2026-10-29 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  12. 2026-10-28 04:59 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  14. 2026-10-27 04:41 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  16. 2026-10-25 23:56 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-24 23:38 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  21. 2026-10-23 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  23. 2026-10-22 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  25. 2026-10-21 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-10-20 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  4. 2026-10-19 22:01 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-17 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  11. 2026-10-16 20:03 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  16. 2026-10-14 11:25 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-12 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-11 20:20 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 10:58 UTCOSV refresh
  27. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  29. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  30. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  31. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  32. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  33. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  34. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  35. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  36. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  37. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  38. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  39. 2026-09-19 18:30 UTCOSV refresh
  40. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  41. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  42. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  43. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  44. 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  45. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  46. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  47. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  48. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  49. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  50. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  51. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  52. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 53rd percentile
  53. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  54. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  55. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  56. 2026-08-31 21:34 UTCOSV refresh
  57. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  58. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  59. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  60. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  61. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  62. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  63. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  64. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  65. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  66. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  67. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  68. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  69. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  70. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  71. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  72. 2026-08-14 15:16 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  74. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-70974?
CVE-2025-70974 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 9, 2026. Fastjson before 1.2.48 mishandles autoType because, when an @type key is in a JSON document, and the value of that key is the name of a Java class, there may be calls to certain public methods of that class. Depending on the behavior of those methods, there may be JNDI injection with an…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-70974 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-70974 was published on January 9, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-70974 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-70974 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-70974?
CVE-2025-70974 has a CVSS base score of 10.0 (the CNA's own assessment, by mitre; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-70974?
A fix for CVE-2025-70974 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-70974 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-70974

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-70974?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.