In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iio: accel: bmc150: Fix irq assumption regression
The code in bmc150-accel-core.c unconditionally calls
bmc150_accel_set_interrupt() in the iio_buffer_setup_ops,
such as on the runtime PM resume path giving a kernel
splat like this if the device has no interrupts:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 00000001 when read
PC is at bmc150_accel_set_interrupt+0x98/0x194
LR is at __pm_runtime_resume+0x5c/0x64
(...)
Call trace:
bmc150_accel_set_interrupt from bmc150_accel_buffer_postenable+0x40/0x108
bmc150_accel_buffer_postenable from __iio_update_buffers+0xbe0/0xcbc
__iio_update_buffers from enable_store+0x84/0xc8
enable_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x1b4
This bug seems to have been in the driver since the beginning,
but it only manifests recently, I do not know why.
Store the IRQ number in the state struct, as this is a common
pattern in other drivers, then use this to determine if we have
IRQ support or not.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it