Vulnerability in the Oracle Concurrent Processing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: BI Publisher Integration). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Concurrent Processing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Concurrent Processing. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
CVE-2025-61882
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-10-06), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8 retained for reference (NVD's own analysis pending). Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2025-32142 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low mission impact
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (Oracle) lists Oracle Corporation Oracle Concurrent Processing versions 12.2.3 up to and including 12.2.14 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 99EG Risk 99/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high. - EPSS PROB
- 99.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 99.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Act at medium mission impactAttend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low mission impact; Act at medium or high.
No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation sooner than your normal schedule at low mission impact and as soon as possible at medium or high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 3 days & forensic triage if it is not.
No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: this CVE is in CISA's KEV catalog, and CISA's required action for it, quoted below, applies whether or not a fix is released.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/alert-cve-2025-61882.html · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-61882
Published
October 5, 2025
Last Modified
October 9, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026CrowdStrike Identifies Campaign Targeting Oracle E-Business Suite via Zero-Day Vulnerability Tracked as CVE-2025-61882
https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/blog/crowdstrike-identifies-campaign-targeting-oracle-e-business-suite-zero-day-CVE-2025-61882/Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-61882Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 103× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 954 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 854 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 11:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 11:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-31 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 12:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 12:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 13:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 13:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.7% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 13:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-26 13:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.7% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 14:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-23 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 14:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 15:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-21 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.7% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-17 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 04:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 04:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 04:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 05:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 10:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 06:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-10 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-09 00:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 04:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-08 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 16:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-07 01:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 17:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 99.7% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-06 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 09:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-06 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 21:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 05:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-05 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 13:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-04 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hgff-wp2m-jgfw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Publicly available exploits
(8 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 4 GitHub PoCs), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 2 GitHub checker repositories. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.
- Metasploitexploit/multi/http/oracle_ebs_cve_2025_61882_exploit_rce✓ verifiedPublished Jan 22, 2026
Oracle E-Business Suite CVE-2025-61882 RCE
Open source ↗ - GitHub checkerBattalionX/http-oracle-ebs-cve-2025-61882.nsePublished Oct 23, 2025
Detects Oracle E-Business Suite (CVE-2025-61882). Detection: multi-tier checks — fingerprinting, version checks, endpoint & SSRF tests, timing analysis & controlled exploitation 4 high-confidence results. Default = safe fingerprinting only. Set aggressive=true 2 enable active/probing checks use w/caution. Provided By BattalionX BattalionX@proton.me
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCAdityaBhatt3010/CVE-2025-61882-Oracle-E-Business-Suite-Pre-Auth-RCE-ExploitPublished Oct 16, 2025
A critical pre-authentication Remote Code Execution (RCE) flaw in Oracle E-Business Suite (versions 12.2.3 - 12.2.14) allows attackers to gain full control over vulnerable servers via malicious HTTP requests - now actively exploited in the wild.
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCzerozenxlabs/CVE-2025-61882-Oracle-EBSPublished Oct 10, 2025
- Nucleihttp/cves/2025/CVE-2025-61882.yamlPublished Oct 7, 2025
Oracle E-Business Suite 12.2.3–12.2.14 – Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCSachinart/CVE-2025-61882Published Oct 6, 2025
Exploit for CVE-2025-61882 (do not use without any written permission).
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCwatchtowrlabs/watchTowr-vs-Oracle-E-Business-Suite-CVE-2025-61882Published Oct 6, 2025
- GitHub checkerrxerium/CVE-2025-61882-CVE-2025-61884Published Oct 5, 2025
Detection for CVE-2025-61882 & CVE-2025-61884
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2025-61882?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-61882 published?
Is CVE-2025-61882 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-61882?
Which products are affected by CVE-2025-61882?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-61882?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-61882
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-61882?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.