Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. In version 3.0.5 and earlier, the forgot-password endpoint in Flowise returns sensitive information including a valid password reset tempToken without authentication or verification. This enables any attacker to generate a reset token for arbitrary users and directly reset their password, leading to a complete account takeover (ATO). This vulnerability applies to both the cloud service (cloud.flowiseai.com) and self-hosted/local Flowise deployments that expose the same API. Commit 9e178d68873eb876073846433a596590d3d9c863 in version 3.0.6 secures password reset endpoints. Several recommended remediation steps are available. Do not return reset tokens or sensitive account details in API responses. Tokens must only be delivered securely via the registered email channel. Ensure forgot-password responds with a generic success message regardless of input, to avoid user enumeration. Require strong validation of the tempToken (e.g., single-use, short expiry, tied to request origin, validated against email delivery). Apply the same fixes to both cloud and self-hosted/local deployments. Log and monitor password reset requests for suspicious activity. Consider multi-factor verification for sensitive accounts.
CVE-2025-58434
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-09-12. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2025-29069 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-wgpv-6j63-x5ph (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 76%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 90EG Risk 90/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation76% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 76%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 76% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
September 12, 2025
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026Critical: Unauthenticated Password Reset Token Disclosure Leading to Account Takeover in Flowise Cloud and Local Deployments · Advisory · FlowiseAI/Flowise · GitHub
https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/advisories/GHSA-wgpv-6j63-x5phcommit 9e178d68873e (FlowiseAI/Flowise)
Patch available: FlowiseAI/Flowise flowise@3.0.6 (contains commit 9e178d68873e)
https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/commit/9e178d68873eb876073846433a596590d3d9c863Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | flowise @ 3.0.6 (fixes <= 3.0.5) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| flowise | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 175 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 79 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wgpv-6j63-x5ph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 08:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wgpv-6j63-x5ph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 08:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 18:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-27 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-25 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-23 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-22 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-22 02:44 UTCEG score recompute
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 49% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-21 01:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-20 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-18 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 22:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-15 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-14 12:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-30 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-13 00:36 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-25 03:56 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-24 09:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-08 21:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(8 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 5 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitauxiliary/admin/http/flowise_auth_bypass_cve_2025_58434✓ verifiedRecorded Oct 28, 2026
Flowise Authentication Bypass
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-52557Published May 13, 2026
Flowise < 3.0.5 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCkarimelsheikh1/HTB-Silentium-WriteupPublished Apr 22, 2026
Hack The Box - Silentium machine writeup | CVE-2025-58434, CVE-2025-59528, CVE-2025-8110
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCkartik2005221/CVE-2025-58434-AND-59528-POCPublished Apr 13, 2026
Combined PoC for CVE-2025-28434 and CVE-2025-59528
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCAzureADTrent/CVE-2025-58434-59528Published Apr 12, 2026
CVE-2025-58434 and CVE-2025-59528 chain POC
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCjwsly12/CVE-2025-58434-59528-htb-ctfPublished Apr 12, 2026
Exploitation Silentium HTB-CTF
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCTYehan/CVE-2025-58434-59528Published Apr 12, 2026
CVE-2025-58434 and CVE-2025-59528 chain POC - FlowiseAI Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗ - Nucleihttp/cves/2025/CVE-2025-58434.yamlPublished Sep 15, 2025
Flowise <= 3.0.5 - Account Takeover
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:flowise
- CVE-2026-70478EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-71338NVD 9.8EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-59528EG 10.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-56274EG 9.9EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-46442EG 9.9EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-40933EG 9.9EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-34267EG 9.9EPSS p94CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-61913EG 9.9EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-73487EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-70477EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-58434?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-58434 published?
Is CVE-2025-58434 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-58434?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-58434?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-58434
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-58434?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.