CVE-2025-58434

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-09-12. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekWeaponized

Also known asEUVD-2025-29069 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-wgpv-6j63-x5ph (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 76%
  • Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 76%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. In version 3.0.5 and earlier, the forgot-password endpoint in Flowise returns sensitive information including a valid password reset tempToken without authentication or verification. This enables any attacker to generate a reset token for arbitrary users and directly reset their password, leading to a complete account takeover (ATO). This vulnerability applies to both the cloud service (cloud.flowiseai.com) and self-hosted/local Flowise deployments that expose the same API. Commit 9e178d68873eb876073846433a596590d3d9c863 in version 3.0.6 secures password reset endpoints. Several recommended remediation steps are available. Do not return reset tokens or sensitive account details in API responses. Tokens must only be delivered securely via the registered email channel. Ensure forgot-password responds with a generic success message regardless of input, to avoid user enumeration. Require strong validation of the tempToken (e.g., single-use, short expiry, tied to request origin, validated against email delivery). Apply the same fixes to both cloud and self-hosted/local deployments. Log and monitor password reset requests for suspicious activity. Consider multi-factor verification for sensitive accounts.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
90
EG Risk 90/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation76% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
76%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
76% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 12, 2025

Last Modified

September 30, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Critical: Unauthenticated Password Reset Token Disclosure Leading to Account Takeover in Flowise Cloud and Local Deployments · Advisory · FlowiseAI/Flowise · GitHub

https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/advisories/GHSA-wgpv-6j63-x5ph
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 9e178d68873e (FlowiseAI/Flowise)

Patch available: FlowiseAI/Flowise flowise@3.0.6 (contains commit 9e178d68873e)

https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/commit/9e178d68873eb876073846433a596590d3d9c863

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npmflowise @ 3.0.6 (fixes <= 3.0.5)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
flowise—
  • every version up to 3.0.6: fixed in 3.0.6
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 175 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 79 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-01 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wgpv-6j63-x5ph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-01 08:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wgpv-6j63-x5ph · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 08:03 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-31 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-10-30 18:09 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-29 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 76% · 99th percentile
  10. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
  11. 2026-10-28 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-28 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
  14. 2026-10-27 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
  16. 2026-10-25 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 16:16 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-24 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
  21. 2026-10-23 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-22 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 51% · 98th percentile
  25. 2026-10-22 02:44 UTCEG score recompute
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 49% · 98th percentile
  2. 2026-10-21 01:52 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-17 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-16 22:12 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  12. 2026-10-15 18:48 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  14. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 12:27 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 15:15 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  22. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  24. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  26. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  27. 2026-09-30 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  29. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  30. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  31. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  32. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  33. 2026-09-21 21:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  34. 2026-09-19 15:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  35. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  36. 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  37. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  38. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  39. 2026-09-13 00:36 UTCOSV refresh
  40. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  41. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  42. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  43. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  45. 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  46. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  47. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  48. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  49. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  50. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  51. 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  52. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  53. 2026-08-25 03:56 UTCOSV refresh
  54. 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  55. 2026-08-24 09:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  56. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  57. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  58. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  59. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  60. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  61. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  62. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  63. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  64. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  65. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  66. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  67. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  68. 2026-08-08 21:25 UTCOSV refresh
  69. 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  70. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile
  71. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 50% · 98th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(8 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 Exploit-DB entry, 5 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Metasploitauxiliary/admin/http/flowise_auth_bypass_cve_2025_58434✓ verified
    Recorded Oct 28, 2026

    Flowise Authentication Bypass

    Open source ↗
  • Exploit-DBEDB-52557
    Published May 13, 2026

    Flowise < 3.0.5 - Missing Authentication for Critical Function

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCkarimelsheikh1/HTB-Silentium-Writeup
    Published Apr 22, 2026

    Hack The Box - Silentium machine writeup | CVE-2025-58434, CVE-2025-59528, CVE-2025-8110

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCkartik2005221/CVE-2025-58434-AND-59528-POC
    Published Apr 13, 2026

    Combined PoC for CVE-2025-28434 and CVE-2025-59528

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCAzureADTrent/CVE-2025-58434-59528
    Published Apr 12, 2026

    CVE-2025-58434 and CVE-2025-59528 chain POC

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCjwsly12/CVE-2025-58434-59528-htb-ctf
    Published Apr 12, 2026

    Exploitation Silentium HTB-CTF

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCTYehan/CVE-2025-58434-59528
    Published Apr 12, 2026

    CVE-2025-58434 and CVE-2025-59528 chain POC - FlowiseAI Remote Code Execution

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2025/CVE-2025-58434.yaml
    Published Sep 15, 2025

    Flowise <= 3.0.5 - Account Takeover

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-58434?
CVE-2025-58434 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 12, 2025. Flowise is a drag & drop user interface to build a customized large language model flow. In version 3.0.5 and earlier, the forgot-password endpoint in Flowise returns sensitive information including a valid password reset tempToken without authentication or verification. This enables any attacker…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-58434 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-58434 was published on September 12, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-58434 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-58434 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: a Metasploit module exists for it, and CISA's SSVC data says a public PoC exists and its EPSS is 50% or more. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 76% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-58434?
CVE-2025-58434 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-58434?
A fix for CVE-2025-58434 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-58434

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-58434?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.