OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for secure smart contract development. Starting in version 5.2.0 and prior to version 5.4.0, the lastIndexOf(bytes,byte,uint256) function of the Bytes.sol library may access uninitialized memory when the following two conditions hold: 1) the provided buffer length is empty (i.e. buffer.length == 0) and position is not 2**256 - 1 (i.e. pos != type(uint256).max). The pos argument could be used to access arbitrary data outside of the buffer bounds. This could lead to the operation running out of gas, or returning an invalid index (outside of the empty buffer). Processing this invalid result for accessing the buffer would cause a revert under normal conditions. When triggered, the function reads memory at offset buffer + 0x20 + pos. If memory at that location (outside the buffer) matches the search pattern, the function would return an out of bound index instead of the expected type(uint256).max. This creates unexpected behavior where callers receive a valid-looking index pointing outside buffer bounds. Subsequent memory accesses that don't check bounds and use the returned index must carefully review the potential impact depending on their setup. Code relying on this function returning type(uint256).max for empty buffers or using the returned index without bounds checking could exhibit undefined behavior. Users should upgrade to version 5.4.0 to receive a patch.
CVE-2025-54070
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.9 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2025-21789 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-9rcw-c2f9-2j55 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.9
- EG Score
- 6.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 31EG Risk 31/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity69% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 34th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.9 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 17, 2025
Last Modified
April 15, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Oct 23, 2026Bytes's lastIndexOf function with position argument performs out-of-bound memory access on empty buffers · Advisory · OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts · GitHub
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/security/advisories/GHSA-9rcw-c2f9-2j55v5.4.0
Patch available: OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts v5.4.0
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/releases/tag/v5.4.0Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @openzeppelin/contracts @ 5.4.0 (fixes >= 5.2.0, < 5.4.0) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| @openzeppelin/contracts | — |
| — |
| @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 95 of 230 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 5 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 135 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-9rcw-c2f9-2j55 · GitHub severity MODERATE
- 2026-11-01 08:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 01:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-23 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
Show 70 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:03 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 25th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-21 06:19 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-02 04:09 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-24 09:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-16 06:29 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-54070?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-54070 published?
Is CVE-2025-54070 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-54070?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-54070?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-54070
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-54070?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.