CVE-2025-47277

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-05-20. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2025-15950 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

vLLM, an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs), has an issue in versions 0.6.5 through 0.8.4 that ONLY impacts environments using the PyNcclPipe KV cache transfer integration with the V0 engine. No other configurations are affected. vLLM supports the use of the PyNcclPipe class to establish a peer-to-peer communication domain for data transmission between distributed nodes. The GPU-side KV-Cache transmission is implemented through the PyNcclCommunicator class, while CPU-side control message passing is handled via the send_obj and recv_obj methods on the CPU side.​ The intention was that this interface should only be exposed to a private network using the IP address specified by the --kv-ip CLI parameter. The vLLM documentation covers how this must be limited to a secured network. The default and intentional behavior from PyTorch is that the TCPStore interface listens on ALL interfaces, regardless of what IP address is provided. The IP address given was only used as a client-side address to use. vLLM was fixed to use a workaround to force the TCPStore instance to bind its socket to a specified private interface. As of version 0.8.5, vLLM limits the TCPStore socket to the private interface as configured.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.0% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.0%
EPSS %ILE
61st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 20, 2025

Last Modified

August 13, 2025

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 9, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_pr.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Remote Code Execution via PyNcclPipe Communication Service · Advisory · vllm-project/vllm · GitHub

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv
GitHub pull request

Use custom address for listening socket

Fix merged in vllm-project/vllm PR #15988 on 2025-04-25 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/15988
GitHub commit

commit 0d6e187e8887 (vllm-project/vllm)

Fix landed in vllm-project/vllm commit 0d6e187e8887 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/0d6e187e88874c39cda7409cf673f9e6546893e7

Patch Availability(13)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhelai1/instructlab-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17567913652025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-gcp-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17568152942025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-azure-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-17568152212025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17567993262025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-aws-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17568152282025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-azure-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-17568153702025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/instructlab-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-17567913912025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/instructlab-intel-rhel9:1.5.3-17579558102025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-intel-rhel9:1.5.3-17567241932025-09-15redhat
redhatrhelai1/bootc-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-17568004372025-09-15redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:3.1.0-17515225402025-07-07redhat
redhatrhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:3.1.0-17515225442025-07-07redhat
pipvllm @ 0.8.5 (fixes >= 0.6.5, < 0.8.5)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
vllm0.6.5 ... 0.8.4 (12 versions)
  • 0.6.5 up to 0.8.5: fixed in 0.8.5
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 245 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 149 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-01 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-01 08:05 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  7. 2026-10-31 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-31 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  10. 2026-10-30 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-30 14:25 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  13. 2026-10-29 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-29 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  16. 2026-10-28 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-28 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 16:15 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:23 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-24 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-24 17:04 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  5. 2026-10-23 17:33 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-23 17:33 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-22 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  11. 2026-10-21 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-21 18:07 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-20 18:34 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  17. 2026-10-19 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-19 18:57 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 19:24 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-18 19:24 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 05:31 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-17 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
  27. 2026-10-16 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-16 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  30. 2026-10-15 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-15 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  33. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  34. 2026-10-14 11:36 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-14 11:36 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  37. 2026-10-13 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-12 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  40. 2026-10-12 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-11 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-11 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-11 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  45. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  46. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  47. 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  48. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  49. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  50. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  51. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  52. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  53. 2026-10-02 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
  54. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  55. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  56. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  57. 2026-09-27 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  58. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  59. 2026-09-26 00:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  60. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  61. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
  62. 2026-09-21 21:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  63. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  64. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  65. 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  66. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  67. 2026-09-15 03:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  68. 2026-09-13 11:24 UTCOSV refresh
  69. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  70. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
  71. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-47277?
CVE-2025-47277 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 20, 2025. vLLM, an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs), has an issue in versions 0.6.5 through 0.8.4 that ONLY impacts environments using the PyNcclPipe KV cache transfer integration with the V0 engine. No other configurations are affected. vLLM supports the use of the PyNcclPipe…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-47277 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-47277 was published on May 20, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 13, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-47277 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-47277 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (61st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-47277?
CVE-2025-47277 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-47277?
A fix for CVE-2025-47277 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-47277 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-47277

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-47277?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.