vLLM, an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs), has an issue in versions 0.6.5 through 0.8.4 that ONLY impacts environments using the PyNcclPipe KV cache transfer integration with the V0 engine. No other configurations are affected. vLLM supports the use of the PyNcclPipe class to establish a peer-to-peer communication domain for data transmission between distributed nodes. The GPU-side KV-Cache transmission is implemented through the PyNcclCommunicator class, while CPU-side control message passing is handled via the send_obj and recv_obj methods on the CPU side. The intention was that this interface should only be exposed to a private network using the IP address specified by the --kv-ip CLI parameter. The vLLM documentation covers how this must be limited to a secured network. The default and intentional behavior from PyTorch is that the TCPStore interface listens on ALL interfaces, regardless of what IP address is provided. The IP address given was only used as a client-side address to use. vLLM was fixed to use a workaround to force the TCPStore instance to bind its socket to a specified private interface. As of version 0.8.5, vLLM limits the TCPStore socket to the private interface as configured.
CVE-2025-47277
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-05-20. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2025-15950 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 59EG Risk 59/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation1.0% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 1.0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 61st
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 1.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 20, 2025
Last Modified
August 13, 2025
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 9, 2026Remote Code Execution via PyNcclPipe Communication Service · Advisory · vllm-project/vllm · GitHub
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fvUse custom address for listening socket
Fix merged in vllm-project/vllm PR #15988 on 2025-04-25 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/15988commit 0d6e187e8887 (vllm-project/vllm)
Fix landed in vllm-project/vllm commit 0d6e187e8887 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/0d6e187e88874c39cda7409cf673f9e6546893e7Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-47277(13)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2025:15867Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 1.5 (Intel Gaudi)
- RHSA-2025:15843Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 1.5 (AMD)
- RHSA-2025:15841Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 1.5 (NVIDIA)
- RHSA-2025:15842Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 1.5 (NVIDIA)
- RHSA-2025:15838Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 1.5 (NVIDIA)
- RHSA-2025:15839Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 1.5 (AMD)
- RHSA-2025:15840Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 1.5 (AMD)
- RHSA-2025:15837Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 1.5 (NVIDIA)
- +5 more
Patch Availability(13)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhelai1/instructlab-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-1756791365 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/bootc-gcp-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-1756815294 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/bootc-azure-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-1756815221 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/bootc-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-1756799326 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/bootc-aws-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-1756815228 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/bootc-azure-nvidia-rhel9:1.5.3-1756815370 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/instructlab-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-1756791391 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/instructlab-intel-rhel9:1.5.3-1757955810 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/bootc-intel-rhel9:1.5.3-1756724193 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhelai1/bootc-amd-rhel9:1.5.3-1756800437 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:3.1.0-1751522540 | 2025-07-07 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:3.1.0-1751522544 | 2025-07-07 | redhat |
| pip | vllm @ 0.8.5 (fixes >= 0.6.5, < 0.8.5) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| vllm | 0.6.5 ... 0.8.4 (12 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 245 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 149 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-11-01 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 08:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-31 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-30 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 14:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-29 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-28 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 15:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-27 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-25 16:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 17:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-23 17:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 17:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-22 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-21 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 18:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-20 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 18:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-19 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 18:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-18 19:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 19:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-18 05:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-16 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-15 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-14 11:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 11:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-13 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-12 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-02 13:11 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-13 11:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:vllm
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-47277?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-47277 published?
Is CVE-2025-47277 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-47277?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-47277?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-47277
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-47277?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.