In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: soc-core: care NULL dirver name on snd_soc_lookup_component_nolocked()
soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c uses same dev for both CPU and Platform.
In such case, CPU component driver might not have driver->name, then
snd_soc_lookup_component_nolocked() will be NULL pointer access error.
Care NULL driver name.
Call trace:
strcmp from snd_soc_lookup_component_nolocked+0x64/0xa4
snd_soc_lookup_component_nolocked from snd_soc_unregister_component_by_driver+0x2c/0x44
snd_soc_unregister_component_by_driver from snd_dmaengine_pcm_unregister+0x28/0x64
snd_dmaengine_pcm_unregister from devres_release_all+0x98/0xfc
devres_release_all from device_unbind_cleanup+0xc/0x60
device_unbind_cleanup from really_probe+0x220/0x2c8
really_probe from __driver_probe_device+0x88/0x1a0
__driver_probe_device from driver_probe_device+0x30/0x110
driver_probe_device from __driver_attach+0x90/0x178
__driver_attach from bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xcc
bus_for_each_dev from bus_add_driver+0xcc/0x1ec
bus_add_driver from driver_register+0x80/0x11c
driver_register from do_one_initcall+0x58/0x23c
do_one_initcall from kernel_init_freeable+0x198/0x1f4
kernel_init_freeable from kernel_init+0x1c/0x12c
kernel_init from ret_from_fork+0x14/0x28
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it