In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: Set ETDM1/2 IN/OUT to COMP_DUMMY()
ETDM2_IN_BE and ETDM1_OUT_BE are defined as COMP_EMPTY(),
in the case the codec dai_name will be null.
Avoid a crash if the device tree is not assigning a codec
to these links.
[ 1.179936] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
[ 1.181065] Mem abort info:
[ 1.181420] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
[ 1.181892] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 1.182576] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 1.182964] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 1.183367] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[ 1.183983] Data abort info:
[ 1.184406] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
[ 1.185097] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
[ 1.185766] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
[ 1.186439] [0000000000000000] user address but active_mm is swapper
[ 1.187239] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 1.188029] Modules linked in:
[ 1.188420] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 70 Comm: kworker/u32:1 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc4-next-20250226+ #85
[ 1.189515] Hardware name: Radxa NIO 12L (DT)
[ 1.190065] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
[ 1.190808] pstate: 40400009 (nZcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 1.191683] pc : __pi_strcmp+0x24/0x140
[ 1.192170] lr : mt8195_mt6359_soc_card_probe+0x224/0x7b0
[ 1.192854] sp : ffff800083473970
[ 1.193271] x29: ffff800083473a10 x28: 0000000000001008 x27: 0000000000000002
[ 1.194168] x26: ffff800082408960 x25: ffff800082417db0 x24: ffff800082417d88
[ 1.195065] x23: 000000000000001e x22: ffff800082dbf480 x21: ffff800082dc07b8
[ 1.195961] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000013 x18: 00000000ffffffff
[ 1.196858] x17: 000000040044ffff x16: 005000f2b5503510 x15: 0000000000000006
[ 1.197755] x14: ffff800082407af0 x13: 6e6f69737265766e x12: 692d6b636f6c6374
[ 1.198651] x11: 0000000000000002 x10: ffff80008240b920 x9 : 0000000000000018
[ 1.199547] x8 : 0101010101010101 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000
[ 1.200443] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 8080808080000000 x3 : 303933383978616d
[ 1.201339] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff80008240b920 x0 : 0000000000000000
[ 1.202236] Call trace:
[ 1.202545] __pi_strcmp+0x24/0x140 (P)
[ 1.203029] mtk_soundcard_common_probe+0x3bc/0x5b8
[ 1.203644] platform_probe+0x70/0xe8
[ 1.204106] really_probe+0xc8/0x3a0
[ 1.204556] __driver_probe_device+0x84/0x160
[ 1.205104] driver_probe_device+0x44/0x130
[ 1.205630] __device_attach_driver+0xc4/0x170
[ 1.206189] bus_for_each_drv+0x8c/0xf8
[ 1.206672] __device_attach+0xa8/0x1c8
[ 1.207155] device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x30
[ 1.207681] bus_probe_device+0xb0/0xc0
[ 1.208165] deferred_probe_work_func+0xa4/0x100
[ 1.208747] process_one_work+0x158/0x3e0
[ 1.209254] worker_thread+0x2c4/0x3e8
[ 1.209727] kthread+0x134/0x1f0
[ 1.210136] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[ 1.210589] Code: 54000401 b50002c6 d503201f f86a6803 (f8408402)
[ 1.211355] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it