CVE-2025-37988

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-05-20. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
4.7
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fix a couple of races in MNT_TREE_BENEATH handling by do_move_mount()

Normally do_lock_mount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the same thing.

Unfortunately, for 'beneath' case it's no longer that simple - the object being locked is not the one *path points to. It's the mountpoint of path->mnt. The thing is, without sufficient locking ->mnt_parent may change under us and none of the locks are held at that point. The rules are * mount_lock stabilizes m->mnt_parent for any mount m. * namespace_sem stabilizes m->mnt_parent, provided that m is mounted. * if either of the above holds and refcount of m is positive, we are guaranteed the same for refcount of m->mnt_parent.

namespace_sem nests inside inode_lock(), so do_lock_mount() has to take inode_lock() before grabbing namespace_sem. It does recheck that path->mnt is still mounted in the same place after getting namespace_sem, and it does take care to pin the dentry. It is needed, since otherwise we might end up with racing mount --move (or umount) happening while we were getting locks; in that case dentry would no longer be a mountpoint and could've been evicted on memory pressure along with its inode - not something you want when grabbing lock on that inode.

However, pinning a dentry is not enough - the matching mount is also pinned only by the fact that path->mnt is mounted on top it and at that point we are not holding any locks whatsoever, so the same kind of races could end up with all references to that mount gone just as we are about to enter inode_lock(). If that happens, we are left with filesystem being shut down while we are holding a dentry reference on it; results are not pretty.

What we need to do is grab both dentry and mount at the same time; that makes inode_lock() safe *and* avoids the problem with fs getting shut down under us. After taking namespace_sem we verify that path->mnt is still mounted (which stabilizes its ->mnt_parent) and check that it's still mounted at the same place. From that point on to the matching namespace_unlock() we are guaranteed that mount/dentry pair we'd grabbed are also pinned by being the mountpoint of path->mnt, so we can quietly drop both the dentry reference (as the current code does) and mnt one - it's OK to do under namespace_sem, since we are not dropping the final refs.

That solves the problem on do_lock_mount() side; unlock_mount() also has one, since dentry is guaranteed to stay pinned only until the namespace_unlock(). That's easy to fix - just have inode_unlock() done earlier, while it's still pinned by mp->m_dentry.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7(medium)
EG Risk
26(Track)
EG Risk 26/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity47% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
1.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 20, 2025

Last Modified

November 14, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-37988(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(20)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-24 05:11 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-07-23 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 00:51 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 51 more
  1. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-18 11:44 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-05-30 04:55 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-05-30 04:55 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-05-30 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-37988?
CVE-2025-37988 is a medium vulnerability published on May 20, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fix a couple of races in MNTTREEBENEATH handling by domovemount() Normally dolockmount(path, _) is locking a mountpoint pinned by *path and at the time when matching unlock_mount() unlocks that location it is still pinned by the…
When was CVE-2025-37988 disclosed?
CVE-2025-37988 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 20, 2025, with the most recent update on November 14, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-37988 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-37988 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-37988?
CVE-2025-37988 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-37988?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-37988, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-37988

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-37988?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.