In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: use sock_gen_put() when sk_state is TCP_TIME_WAIT
It is possible for a pointer of type struct inet_timewait_sock to be
returned from the functions __inet_lookup_established() and
__inet6_lookup_established(). This can cause a crash when the
returned pointer is of type struct inet_timewait_sock and
sock_put() is called on it. The following is a crash call stack that
shows sk->sk_wmem_alloc being accessed in sk_free() during the call to
sock_put() on a struct inet_timewait_sock pointer. To avoid this issue,
use sock_gen_put() instead of sock_put() when sk->sk_state
is TCP_TIME_WAIT.
mrdump.ko ipanic() + 120
vmlinux notifier_call_chain(nr_to_call=-1, nr_calls=0) + 132
vmlinux atomic_notifier_call_chain(val=0) + 56
vmlinux panic() + 344
vmlinux add_taint() + 164
vmlinux end_report() + 136
vmlinux kasan_report(size=0) + 236
vmlinux report_tag_fault() + 16
vmlinux do_tag_recovery() + 16
vmlinux __do_kernel_fault() + 88
vmlinux do_bad_area() + 28
vmlinux do_tag_check_fault() + 60
vmlinux do_mem_abort() + 80
vmlinux el1_abort() + 56
vmlinux el1h_64_sync_handler() + 124
vmlinux > 0xFFFFFFC080011294()
vmlinux __lse_atomic_fetch_add_release(v=0xF2FFFF82A896087C)
vmlinux __lse_atomic_fetch_sub_release(v=0xF2FFFF82A896087C)
vmlinux arch_atomic_fetch_sub_release(i=1, v=0xF2FFFF82A896087C)
+ 8
vmlinux raw_atomic_fetch_sub_release(i=1, v=0xF2FFFF82A896087C)
+ 8
vmlinux atomic_fetch_sub_release(i=1, v=0xF2FFFF82A896087C) + 8
vmlinux __refcount_sub_and_test(i=1, r=0xF2FFFF82A896087C,
oldp=0) + 8
vmlinux __refcount_dec_and_test(r=0xF2FFFF82A896087C, oldp=0) + 8
vmlinux refcount_dec_and_test(r=0xF2FFFF82A896087C) + 8
vmlinux sk_free(sk=0xF2FFFF82A8960700) + 28
vmlinux sock_put() + 48
vmlinux tcp6_check_fraglist_gro() + 236
vmlinux tcp6_gro_receive() + 624
vmlinux ipv6_gro_receive() + 912
vmlinux dev_gro_receive() + 1116
vmlinux napi_gro_receive() + 196
ccmni.ko ccmni_rx_callback() + 208
ccmni.ko ccmni_queue_recv_skb() + 388
ccci_dpmaif.ko dpmaif_rxq_push_thread() + 1088
vmlinux kthread() + 268
vmlinux 0xFFFFFFC08001F30C()
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it