CVE-2025-26625

HIGHNVD 8.68.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.6 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.1% (64th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2025-34886 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6pvw-g552-53c5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.1%CVSS: 8.6Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Git LFS is a Git extension for versioning large files. In Git LFS versions 0.5.2 through 3.7.0, when populating a Git repository's working tree with the contents of Git LFS objects, certain Git LFS commands may write to files visible outside the current Git working tree if symbolic or hard links exist which collide with the paths of files tracked by Git LFS. The git lfs checkout and git lfs pull commands do not check for symbolic links before writing to files in the working tree, allowing an attacker to craft a repository containing symbolic or hard links that cause Git LFS to write to arbitrary file system locations accessible to the user running these commands. As well, when the git lfs checkout and git lfs pull commands are run in a bare repository, they could write to files visible outside the repository. The vulnerability is fixed in version 3.7.1. As a workaround, support for symlinks in Git may be disabled by setting the core.symlinks configuration option to false, after which further clones and fetches will not create symbolic links. However, any symbolic or hard links in existing repositories will still provide the opportunity for Git LFS to write to their targets.

CVSS v3
8.6
EG Score
8.6HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
54
EG Risk 54/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity86% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.1%
EPSS %ILE
64th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.6 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
1.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 17, 2025

Last Modified

October 21, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated May 31, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_release, github.
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 4610-1] git-lfs security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/05/msg00055.html
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Git LFS may write to arbitrary files via crafted links · Advisory · git-lfs/git-lfs · GitHub

Affected: v3.7.1. All users should upgrade to v3.7.1.

https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/security/advisories/GHSA-6pvw-g552-53c5
GitHub release Patch Available

v3.7.1

Patch available: git-lfs/git-lfs v3.7.1

https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/releases/tag/v3.7.1
GitHub commit

commit d02bd13f02ef (git-lfs/git-lfs)

Fix landed in git-lfs/git-lfs commit d02bd13f02ef — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/commit/d02bd13f02ef76f6807581cd6b34709069cb3615
GitHub commit

commit 5c11ffce9a4f (git-lfs/git-lfs)

Fix landed in git-lfs/git-lfs commit 5c11ffce9a4f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/commit/5c11ffce9a4f095ff356bc781e2a031abb46c1a8
GitHub commit

commit 0cffe93176b8 (git-lfs/git-lfs)

Fix landed in git-lfs/git-lfs commit 0cffe93176b8 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/commit/0cffe93176b870055c9dadbb3cc9a4a440e98396

Patch Availability(15)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntugit-lfs (2.3.4-1ubuntu0.1~esm1) @ bionic2026-10-27ubuntu
redhatgit-lfs-0:2.13.3-5.el9_0.52026-01-12redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:2.13.3-3.el8_4.32026-01-12redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:3.2.0-2.el8_8.52026-01-12redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:2.13.3-3.el8_6.52026-01-12redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:3.2.0-2.el9_2.42026-01-07redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:3.4.1-4.el9_4.32026-01-07redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:3.6.1-2.el10_0.12026-01-07redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:3.6.1-2.el9_6.12026-01-07redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:3.4.1-6.el8_102025-12-22redhat
redhatruby-0:3.3.10-11.el10_02025-12-22redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:3.6.1-4.el9_72025-12-22redhat
redhatruby:3.3-9060020251210162455.92025-12-18redhat
redhatgit-lfs-0:3.6.1-4.el10_12025-12-18redhat
gogithub.com/git-lfs/git-lfs @ 3.7.1 (fixes >= 0.5.2, <= 3.7.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 5 ecosystems)
Go(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs—
  • 0.5.2 up to 3.7.1: fixed in 3.7.1
  • 0.5.2 on: no fix on record
—
github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/v3—
  • every version up to 3.7.1: fixed in 3.7.1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git-lfs2.13.2-1, 2.13.2-1+deb11u1
  • every version up to 2.13.2-1+deb11u2: fixed in 2.13.2-1+deb11u2
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git-lfs3.3.0-1 ... 3.8.0-1 (9 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git-lfs3.6.1-1
  • every version up to 3.6.1-1+deb13u1: fixed in 3.6.1-1+deb13u1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
git-lfs3.6.1-1
  • every version up to 3.7.1-1: fixed in 3.7.1-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 232 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 136 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 08:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6pvw-g552-53c5 · GitHub severity HIGH
  3. 2026-11-01 08:08 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-27 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  11. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  14. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-21 10:16 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-21 10:16 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-18 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-18 19:16 UTCVendor advisory
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-11 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 17:03 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-02 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  26. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  27. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  28. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  29. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  30. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  31. 2026-09-21 04:19 UTCOSV refresh
  32. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  33. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  34. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  35. 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  36. 2026-09-15 03:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  37. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  38. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  39. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  40. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  41. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  42. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  43. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  44. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  45. 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  46. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  47. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  48. 2026-09-02 01:58 UTCOSV refresh
  49. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  50. 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  51. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  52. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  53. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  54. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  55. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  56. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  57. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  58. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  59. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  60. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  61. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  62. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  63. 2026-08-16 05:08 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  65. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  66. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  67. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  68. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  69. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  70. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  71. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-26625?
CVE-2025-26625 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 17, 2025. Git LFS is a Git extension for versioning large files. In Git LFS versions 0.5.2 through 3.7.0, when populating a Git repository's working tree with the contents of Git LFS objects, certain Git LFS commands may write to files visible outside the current Git working tree if symbolic or hard links…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-26625 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-26625 was published on October 17, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-26625 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-26625 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (64th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-26625?
CVE-2025-26625 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.6 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-26625?
A fix for CVE-2025-26625 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-26625 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-26625

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-26625?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.