External control of file name or path in Windows NTLM allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
CVE-2025-24054
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-04-17), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 6.5 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 6.5 MEDIUM under GitHub Security Advisory CVSS. Confidence: HIGH.
Also known asEUVD-2025-6336 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6v67-599p-fprc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at every mission impact level
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 69EG Risk 69/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation100% × 40%Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 62%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- ⚠ Exploited
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 6.5 MEDIUM.
- EG Severity
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 62% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”
Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-24054 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24054
Published
March 11, 2025
Last Modified
February 13, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated Oct 27, 2026Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA
Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2025-24054CVE-2025-24054 - Spoofing Vulnerability in Windows NTLM by Microsoft - Mitigation Script - vsociety
https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2025-24054-spoofing-vulnerability-in-windows-ntlm-by-microsoft-mitigation-scriptCVE-2025-24054 - Spoofing Vulnerability in Windows NTLM by Microsoft - Detection Script - vsociety
https://www.vicarius.io/vsociety/posts/cve-2025-24054-spoofing-vulnerability-in-windows-ntlm-by-microsoft-detection-scriptWindows 10.0.17763.7009 - spoofing vulnerability - Windows remote Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52480windows 10/11 - NTLM Hash Disclosure Spoofing - Windows remote Exploit
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52478Full Disclosure: Microsoft ".library-ms" File / NTLM Information Disclosure (Resurrected 2025)
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2025/Apr/28Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center
https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-24054Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-24054(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 213× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 1,979 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 1,879 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-02 03:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-11-01 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 03:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-11-01 03:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-31 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 03:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-31 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 03:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-30 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 04:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-27 04:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-26 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-25 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 05:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-25 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-24 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 05:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-23 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-23 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-22 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 06:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 06:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 06:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 06:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 06:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-21 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 06:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 06:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-19 06:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-18 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-17 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-16 07:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-15 07:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 62% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 08:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 08:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-12 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 08:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-12 05:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-12 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-11 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 21:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-11 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 59% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-11 10:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-11 07:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-11 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-10 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
- 2026-10-10 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6v67-599p-fprc · GitHub CVSS 6.5
Publicly available exploits
(6 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (3 Exploit-DB entries, 3 GitHub PoCs). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Exploit-DBEDB-52480Published Feb 11, 2026
Windows 10.0.17763.7009 - spoofing vulnerability
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-52478Published Feb 4, 2026
windows 10/11 - NTLM Hash Disclosure Spoofing
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCUntouchable17/CVE-2025-24054Published Nov 23, 2025
Windows File Explorer Zero Click NTLMv2-SSP Hash Disclosure
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-52280Published May 1, 2025
Microsoft - NTLM Hash Disclosure Spoofing (library-ms)
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoChelidem/CVE-2025-24054_CVE-2025-24071-PoCPublished Apr 22, 2025
Proof of Concept for the NTLM Hash Leak via .library-ms CVE-2025-24054 / CVE-2025-24071
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCbasekilll/CVE-2025-24054_PoCPublished Apr 18, 2025
PoC - CVE-2025-24071 / CVE-2025-24054, NTMLv2 hash'leri alınabilen bir vulnerability
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(6)
What is CVE-2025-24054?
When was CVE-2025-24054 made public?
Is CVE-2025-24054 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-24054?
Which products are affected by CVE-2025-24054?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-24054?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-24054
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-24054?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.