CVE-2025-22077

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-04-16. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Revert "smb: client: fix TCP timers deadlock after rmmod"

This reverts commit e9f2517a3e18a54a3943c098d2226b245d488801.

Commit e9f2517a3e18 ("smb: client: fix TCP timers deadlock after rmmod") is intended to fix a null-ptr-deref in LOCKDEP, which is mentioned as CVE-2024-54680, but is actually did not fix anything; The issue can be reproduced on top of it. [0]

Also, it reverted the change by commit ef7134c7fc48 ("smb: client: Fix use-after-free of network namespace.") and introduced a real issue by reviving the kernel TCP socket.

When a reconnect happens for a CIFS connection, the socket state transitions to FIN_WAIT_1. Then, inet_csk_clear_xmit_timers_sync() in tcp_close() stops all timers for the socket.

If an incoming FIN packet is lost, the socket will stay at FIN_WAIT_1 forever, and such sockets could be leaked up to net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans.

Usually, FIN can be retransmitted by the peer, but if the peer aborts the connection, the issue comes into reality.

I warned about this privately by pointing out the exact report [1], but the bogus fix was finally merged.

So, we should not stop the timers to finally kill the connection on our side in that case, meaning we must not use a kernel socket for TCP whose sk->sk_net_refcnt is 0.

The kernel socket does not have a reference to its netns to make it possible to tear down netns without cleaning up every resource in it.

For example, tunnel devices use a UDP socket internally, but we can destroy netns without removing such devices and let it complete during exit. Otherwise, netns would be leaked when the last application died.

However, this is problematic for TCP sockets because TCP has timers to close the connection gracefully even after the socket is close()d. The lifetime of the socket and its netns is different from the lifetime of the underlying connection.

If the socket user does not maintain the netns lifetime, the timer could be fired after the socket is close()d and its netns is freed up, resulting in use-after-free.

Actually, we have seen so many similar issues and converted such sockets to have a reference to netns.

That's why I converted the CIFS client socket to have a reference to netns (sk->sk_net_refcnt == 1), which is somehow mentioned as out-of-scope of CIFS and technically wrong in e9f2517a3e18, but **is in-scope and right fix**.

Regarding the LOCKDEP issue, we can prevent the module unload by bumping the module refcount when switching the LOCKDDEP key in sock_lock_init_class_and_name(). [2]

For a while, let's revert the bogus fix.

Note that now we can use sk_net_refcnt_upgrade() for the socket conversion, but I'll do so later separately to make backport easy.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
3.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 16, 2025

Last Modified

October 31, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.6.88osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-24 09:11 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-23 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 64 more
  1. 2026-07-07 04:21 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-18 15:35 UTCOSV refresh
  31. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-30 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-05-30 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-05-30 06:50 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-22077?
CVE-2025-22077 is a medium vulnerability published on April 16, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Revert "smb: client: fix TCP timers deadlock after rmmod" This reverts commit e9f2517a3e18a54a3943c098d2226b245d488801. Commit e9f2517a3e18 ("smb: client: fix TCP timers deadlock after rmmod") is intended to fix a null-ptr-deref in…
When was CVE-2025-22077 disclosed?
CVE-2025-22077 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 16, 2025, with the most recent update on October 31, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2025-22077 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-22077 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 3.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-22077?
CVE-2025-22077 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-22077?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2025-22077, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2025-22077

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-22077?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.