CVE-2025-21825

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-03-06. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2025-6220 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v333-5589-2mh9 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Cancel the running bpf_timer through kworker for PREEMPT_RT

During the update procedure, when overwrite element in a pre-allocated htab, the freeing of old_element is protected by the bucket lock. The reason why the bucket lock is necessary is that the old_element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems after alloc_htab_elem() returns. If freeing the old_element after the bucket lock is unlocked, the stashed element may be reused by concurrent update procedure and the freeing of old_element will run concurrently with the reuse of the old_element. However, the invocation of check_and_free_fields() may acquire a spin-lock which violates the lockdep rule because its caller has already held a raw-spin-lock (bucket lock). The following warning will be reported when such race happens:

BUG: scheduling while atomic: test_progs/676/0x00000003 3 locks held by test_progs/676: #0: ffffffff864b0240 (rcu_read_lock_trace){....}-{0:0}, at: bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x2c0/0x830 #1: ffff88810e961188 (&htab->lockdep_key){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x306/0x1500 #2: ffff8881f4eac1b8 (&base->softirq_expiry_lock){....}-{2:2}, at: hrtimer_cancel_wait_running+0xe9/0x1b0 Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(O) Preemption disabled at: [] htab_map_update_elem+0x293/0x1500 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 676 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G ... 6.12.0+ #11 Tainted: [W]=WARN, [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)... Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x70 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __schedule_bug+0x120/0x170 __schedule+0x300c/0x4800 schedule_rtlock+0x37/0x60 rtlock_slowlock_locked+0x6d9/0x54c0 rt_spin_lock+0x168/0x230 hrtimer_cancel_wait_running+0xe9/0x1b0 hrtimer_cancel+0x24/0x30 bpf_timer_delete_work+0x1d/0x40 bpf_timer_cancel_and_free+0x5e/0x80 bpf_obj_free_fields+0x262/0x4a0 check_and_free_fields+0x1d0/0x280 htab_map_update_elem+0x7fc/0x1500 bpf_prog_9f90bc20768e0cb9_overwrite_cb+0x3f/0x43 bpf_prog_ea601c4649694dbd_overwrite_timer+0x5d/0x7e bpf_prog_test_run_syscall+0x322/0x830 __sys_bpf+0x135d/0x3ca0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0 x64_sys_call+0x1b5/0xa10 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 ...

It seems feasible to break the reuse and refill of per-cpu extra_elems into two independent parts: reuse the per-cpu extra_elems with bucket lock being held and refill the old_element as per-cpu extra_elems after the bucket lock is unlocked. However, it will make the concurrent overwrite procedures on the same CPU return unexpected -E2BIG error when the map is full.

Therefore, the patch fixes the lock problem by breaking the cancelling of bpf_timer into two steps for PREEMPT_RT: 1) use hrtimer_try_to_cancel() and check its return value 2) if the timer is running, use hrtimer_cancel() through a kworker to cancel it again Considering that the current implementation of hrtimer_cancel() will try to acquire a being held softirq_expiry_lock when the current timer is running, these steps above are reasonable. However, it also has downside. When the timer is running, the cancelling of the timer is delayed when releasing the last map uref. The delay is also fixable (e.g., break the cancelling of bpf timer into two parts: one part in locked scope, another one in unlocked scope), it can be revised later if necessary.

It is a bit hard to decide the right fix tag. One reason is that the problem depends on PREEMPT_RT which is enabled in v6.12. Considering the softirq_expiry_lock lock exists since v5.4 and bpf_timer is introduced in v5.15, the bpf_timer commit is used in the fixes tag and an extra depends-on tag is added to state the dependency on PREEMPT_RT.

Depends-on: v6.12+ with PREEMPT_RT enabled

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 6, 2025

Last Modified

October 21, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 5, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

bpf: Cancel the running bpf_timer through kworker for PREEMPT_RT - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58f038e6d209d2dd862fcf5de55407855856794d
Web page

bpf: Cancel the running bpf_timer through kworker for PREEMPT_RT - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fbeda3d939ca10063aafa7a77cc0f409d82cda88
Web page

bpf: Cancel the running bpf_timer through kworker for PREEMPT_RT - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33e47d9573075342a41783a55c8c67bc71246fc1

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-21825(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(14)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-26.26) @ oracular2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-64.67~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-64.67) @ noble2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws (6.11.0-1014.15) @ oracular2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (6.8.0-64.67.1) @ noble2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-64k (6.11.0-1016.17) @ oracular2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1029.30) @ noble2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1033.35) @ noble2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2026.27) @ noble2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-6.8 (6.8.0-1031.35) @ noble2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-nvidia-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1022.23) @ noble2026-10-21ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-6.8.1 (6.8.1-1025.26) @ noble2026-10-21ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.12.13 (fixes >=5.15.0)—osv
linuxKernel @ 6.6.160 (fixes >=5.15.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (350 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.13-1: fixed in 6.12.13-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.13-1: fixed in 6.12.13-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 207 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 111 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 07:55 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-21 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v333-5589-2mh9 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  18. 2026-10-21 13:01 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-21 13:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v333-5589-2mh9 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  20. 2026-10-21 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-21 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-21 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v333-5589-2mh9 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  23. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  24. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-18 05:46 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-17 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  3. 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  4. 2026-10-15 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-15 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-15 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v333-5589-2mh9 · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  7. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-10-12 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-11 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  26. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  27. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  28. 2026-09-27 03:45 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  30. 2026-09-26 00:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  31. 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  32. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  33. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  34. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  35. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  36. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  37. 2026-09-16 05:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  38. 2026-09-15 03:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  39. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  40. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  41. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  42. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  43. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  44. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  45. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  46. 2026-09-07 13:17 UTCOSV refresh
  47. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  48. 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  49. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  50. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  51. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  52. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  53. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  54. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  55. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  56. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  57. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  58. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  59. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  60. 2026-08-20 22:31 UTCOSV refresh
  61. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  62. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  63. 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  65. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  66. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  67. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  69. 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  70. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  71. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-21825?
CVE-2025-21825 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 6, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Cancel the running bpf_timer through kworker for PREEMPT_RT During the update procedure, when overwrite element in a pre-allocated htab, the freeing of old_element is protected by the bucket lock. The reason why the bucket…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-21825 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2025-21825 was published on March 6, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-21825 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-21825 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-21825?
CVE-2025-21825 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-21825?
A fix for CVE-2025-21825 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-21825 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-21825

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-21825?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.