In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
team: better TEAM_OPTION_TYPE_STRING validation
syzbot reported following splat [1]
Make sure user-provided data contains one nul byte.
[1]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in string_nocheck lib/vsprintf.c:633 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in string+0x3ec/0x5f0 lib/vsprintf.c:714
string_nocheck lib/vsprintf.c:633 [inline]
string+0x3ec/0x5f0 lib/vsprintf.c:714
vsnprintf+0xa5d/0x1960 lib/vsprintf.c:2843
__request_module+0x252/0x9f0 kernel/module/kmod.c:149
team_mode_get drivers/net/team/team_core.c:480 [inline]
team_change_mode drivers/net/team/team_core.c:607 [inline]
team_mode_option_set+0x437/0x970 drivers/net/team/team_core.c:1401
team_option_set drivers/net/team/team_core.c:375 [inline]
team_nl_options_set_doit+0x1339/0x1f90 drivers/net/team/team_core.c:2662
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115 [inline]
genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline]
genl_rcv_msg+0x1214/0x12c0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210
netlink_rcv_skb+0x375/0x650 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2543
genl_rcv+0x40/0x60 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1322 [inline]
netlink_unicast+0xf52/0x1260 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1348
netlink_sendmsg+0x10da/0x11e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1892
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:718 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x30f/0x380 net/socket.c:733
____sys_sendmsg+0x877/0xb60 net/socket.c:2573
___sys_sendmsg+0x28d/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2627
__sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2659 [inline]
__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2664 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2662 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendmsg+0x212/0x3c0 net/socket.c:2662
x64_sys_call+0x2ed6/0x3c30 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:47
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it