The porte_plume plugin used by SPIP before 4.30-alpha2, 4.2.13, and 4.1.16 is vulnerable to an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. A remote and unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary PHP as the SPIP user by sending a crafted HTTP request.
CVE-2024-7954
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2024-08-23. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2024-48791 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 90%
- Public exploit code is available (Metasploit, other public proof-of-concept code)
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 95EG Risk 95/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation90% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 90%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 90% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 23, 2024
Last Modified
April 15, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026SPIP porte_plume plugin Arbitrary PHP Execution | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://vulncheck.com/advisories/spip-porte-plumeSpip Preauth RCE 2024: Part 1, The Feather • Think Love Share
https://thinkloveshare.com/hacking/spip_preauth_rce_2024_part_1_the_feather/Mise à jour critique de sécurité : sortie de SPIP 4.3.0-alpha2, SPIP 4.2.13, (…) - SPIP Blog
https://blog.spip.net/Mise-a-jour-critique-de-securite-sortie-de-SPIP-4-3-0-alpha2-SPIP-4-2-13-SPIP-4.htmlAffected Packages
(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| spip | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| spip | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 54× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 91 of 127 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 9 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 36 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-11-02 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-11-01 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-31 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-30 13:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 12:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 11:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 09:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-26 08:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-23 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 66 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-22 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 04:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 03:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 03:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 01:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 01:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-17 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 20:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 20:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 15:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 15:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 17:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 12:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-42mv-3h37-wfh9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 09:05 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-02 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 14:50 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-29 15:13 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-13 02:43 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-28 10:54 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-11 02:41 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
- 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 90% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(7 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 5 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Metasploitexploit/multi/http/spip_porte_plume_previsu_rce✓ verifiedPublished Aug 21, 2024
SPIP Unauthenticated RCE via porte_plume Plugin
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoC0dayan0n/RCE_CVE-2024-7954-Published Dec 28, 2024
The porte_plume plugin used by SPIP before 4.30-alpha2, 4.2.13, and 4.1.16 is vulnerable to an arbitrary code execution vulnerability. A remote and unauthenticated attacker can execute arbitrary PHP as the SPIP user by sending a crafted HTTP request. (CRITICAL)
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCTheCyberguy-17/RCE_CVE-2024-7954Published Sep 23, 2024
- GitHub PoCgh-ost00/CVE-2024-7954-RCEPublished Sep 1, 2024
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in SPIP versions up to and including 4.2.12
Open source ↗ - Nucleihttp/cves/2024/CVE-2024-7954.yamlPublished Aug 29, 2024
SPIP Porte Plume Plugin - Remote Code Execution
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCbigb0x/CVE-2024-7954Published Aug 28, 2024
This exploit will attempt to execute system commands on SPIP targets.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCChocapikk/CVE-2024-7954Published Aug 10, 2024
Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in SPIP versions up to and including 4.2.12
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:13:spip
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-7954?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-7954 published?
Is CVE-2024-7954 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-7954?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-7954?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-7954
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-7954?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.