CVE-2024-57914

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-01-19. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usb: typec: tcpci: fix NULL pointer issue on shared irq case

The tcpci_irq() may meet below NULL pointer dereference issue:

[ 2.641851] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010 [ 2.641951] status 0x1, 0x37f [ 2.650659] Mem abort info: [ 2.656490] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 2.660230] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 2.665532] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 2.668579] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 2.671715] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 2.676584] Data abort info: [ 2.679459] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 2.684936] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 2.689980] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 2.695284] [0000000000000010] user address but active_mm is swapper [ 2.701632] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 2.707883] Modules linked in: [ 2.710936] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 87 Comm: irq/111-2-0051 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-06316-g7f63786ad3d1-dirty #4 [ 2.720570] Hardware name: NXP i.MX93 11X11 EVK board (DT) [ 2.726040] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 2.732989] pc : tcpci_irq+0x38/0x318 [ 2.736647] lr : _tcpci_irq+0x14/0x20 [ 2.740295] sp : ffff80008324bd30 [ 2.743597] x29: ffff80008324bd70 x28: ffff800080107894 x27: ffff800082198f70 [ 2.750721] x26: ffff0000050e6680 x25: ffff000004d172ac x24: ffff0000050f0000 [ 2.757845] x23: ffff000004d17200 x22: 0000000000000001 x21: ffff0000050f0000 [ 2.764969] x20: ffff000004d17200 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000001 [ 2.772093] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff80008183d8a0 x15: ffff00007fbab040 [ 2.779217] x14: ffff00007fb918c0 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 000000000000017a [ 2.786341] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000a90 x9 : ffff80008324bd00 [ 2.793465] x8 : ffff0000050f0af0 x7 : ffff00007fbaa840 x6 : 0000000000000031 [ 2.800589] x5 : 000000000000017a x4 : 0000000000000002 x3 : 0000000000000002 [ 2.807713] x2 : ffff80008324bd3a x1 : 0000000000000010 x0 : 0000000000000000 [ 2.814838] Call trace: [ 2.817273] tcpci_irq+0x38/0x318 [ 2.820583] _tcpci_irq+0x14/0x20 [ 2.823885] irq_thread_fn+0x2c/0xa8 [ 2.827456] irq_thread+0x16c/0x2f4 [ 2.830940] kthread+0x110/0x114 [ 2.834164] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 2.837738] Code: f9426420 f9001fe0 d2800000 52800201 (f9400a60)

This may happen on shared irq case. Such as two Type-C ports share one irq. After the first port finished tcpci_register_port(), it may trigger interrupt. However, if the interrupt comes by chance the 2nd port finishes devm_request_threaded_irq(), the 2nd port interrupt handler will run at first. Then the above issue happens due to tcpci is still a NULL pointer in tcpci_irq() when dereference to regmap.

devm_request_threaded_irq() <-- port1 irq comes disable_irq(client->irq); tcpci_register_port()

This will restore the logic to the state before commit (77e85107a771 "usb: typec: tcpci: support edge irq").

However, moving tcpci_register_port() earlier creates a problem when use edge irq because tcpci_init() will be called before devm_request_threaded_irq(). The tcpci_init() writes the ALERT_MASK to the hardware to tell it to start generating interrupts but we're not ready to deal with them yet, then the ALERT events may be missed and ALERT line will not recover to high level forever. To avoid the issue, this will also set ALERT_MASK register after devm_request_threaded_irq() return.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

January 19, 2025

Last Modified

October 1, 2025

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.12.10osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-24 17:41 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-23 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 12:51 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-19 00:05 UTCOSV refresh
  34. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-30 13:05 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-05-30 13:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-05-30 04:54 UTCOSV refresh
  73. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-57914?
CVE-2024-57914 is a medium vulnerability published on January 19, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: typec: tcpci: fix NULL pointer issue on shared irq case The tcpci_irq() may meet below NULL pointer dereference issue: [ 2.641851] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010 […
When was CVE-2024-57914 disclosed?
CVE-2024-57914 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on January 19, 2025, with the most recent update on October 1, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-57914 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-57914 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-57914?
CVE-2024-57914 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-57914?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-57914, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-57914

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-57914?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.