CVE-2024-56702

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-12-28. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL

Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this issue is available in [0].

Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL, causing explicit NULL checks to be deleted, and accesses to such pointers potentially crashing the kernel.

To fix this, mark raw_tp arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL, and then special case the dereference and pointer arithmetic to permit it, and allow passing them into helpers/kfuncs; these exceptions are made for raw_tp programs only. Ensure that we don't do this when ref_obj_id > 0, as in that case this is an acquired object and doesn't need such adjustment.

The reason we do mask_raw_tp_trusted_reg logic is because other will recheck in places whether the register is a trusted_reg, and then consider our register as untrusted when detecting the presence of the PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag.

To allow safe dereference, we enable PROBE_MEM marking when we see loads into trusted pointers with PTR_MAYBE_NULL.

While trusted raw_tp arguments can also be passed into helpers or kfuncs where such broken assumption may cause issues, a future patch set will tackle their case separately, as PTR_TO_BTF_ID (without PTR_TRUSTED) can already be passed into helpers and causes similar problems. Thus, they are left alone for now.

It is possible that these checks also permit passing non-raw_tp args that are trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID with null marking. In such a case, allowing dereference when pointer is NULL expands allowed behavior, so won't regress existing programs, and the case of passing these into helpers is the same as above and will be dealt with later.

Also update the failure case in tp_btf_nullable selftest to capture the new behavior, as the verifier will no longer cause an error when directly dereference a raw tracepoint argument marked as __nullable.

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrCZS6nisraEqehw@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
12%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 28, 2024

Last Modified

October 1, 2025

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-18.18) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1005.5) @ oracular2026-05-23ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1015.15) @ noble2026-05-23ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.11.11osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(3)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 107 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-20 17:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 15:08 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-25 12:31 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-08 03:28 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-56702?
CVE-2024-56702 is a medium vulnerability published on December 28, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Mark rawtp arguments with PTRMAYBE_NULL Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being…
When was CVE-2024-56702 disclosed?
CVE-2024-56702 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 28, 2024, with the most recent update on October 1, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-56702 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-56702 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 88.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-56702?
CVE-2024-56702 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-56702?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-56702, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-56702

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-56702?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.