In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dccp: Fix memory leak in dccp_feat_change_recv
If dccp_feat_push_confirm() fails after new value for SP feature was accepted
without reconciliation ('entry == NULL' branch), memory allocated for that value
with dccp_feat_clone_sp_val() is never freed.
Here is the kmemleak stack for this:
unreferenced object 0xffff88801d4ab488 (size 8):
comm "syz-executor310", pid 1127, jiffies 4295085598 (age 41.666s)
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
01 b4 4a 1d 80 88 ff ff ..J.....
backtrace:
[<00000000db7cabfe>] kmemdup+0x23/0x50 mm/util.c:128
[<0000000019b38405>] kmemdup include/linux/string.h:465 [inline]
[<0000000019b38405>] dccp_feat_clone_sp_val net/dccp/feat.c:371 [inline]
[<0000000019b38405>] dccp_feat_clone_sp_val net/dccp/feat.c:367 [inline]
[<0000000019b38405>] dccp_feat_change_recv net/dccp/feat.c:1145 [inline]
[<0000000019b38405>] dccp_feat_parse_options+0x1196/0x2180 net/dccp/feat.c:1416
[<00000000b1f6d94a>] dccp_parse_options+0xa2a/0x1260 net/dccp/options.c:125
[<0000000030d7b621>] dccp_rcv_state_process+0x197/0x13d0 net/dccp/input.c:650
[<000000001f74c72e>] dccp_v4_do_rcv+0xf9/0x1a0 net/dccp/ipv4.c:688
[<00000000a6c24128>] sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1041 [inline]
[<00000000a6c24128>] __release_sock+0x139/0x3b0 net/core/sock.c:2570
[<00000000cf1f3a53>] release_sock+0x54/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3111
[<000000008422fa23>] inet_wait_for_connect net/ipv4/af_inet.c:603 [inline]
[<000000008422fa23>] __inet_stream_connect+0x5d0/0xf70 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:696
[<0000000015b6f64d>] inet_stream_connect+0x53/0xa0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:735
[<0000000010122488>] __sys_connect_file+0x15c/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1865
[<00000000b4b70023>] __sys_connect+0x165/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1882
[<00000000f4cb3815>] __do_sys_connect net/socket.c:1892 [inline]
[<00000000f4cb3815>] __se_sys_connect net/socket.c:1889 [inline]
[<00000000f4cb3815>] __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xb0 net/socket.c:1889
[<00000000e7b1e839>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
[<0000000055e91434>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x67/0xd1
Clean up the allocated memory in case of dccp_feat_push_confirm() failure
and bail out with an error reset code.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it