In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
media: qcom: camss: fix error path on configuration of power domains
There is a chance to meet runtime issues during configuration of CAMSS
power domains, because on the error path dev_pm_domain_detach() is
unexpectedly called with NULL or error pointer.
One of the simplest ways to reproduce the problem is to probe CAMSS
driver before registration of CAMSS power domains, for instance if
a platform CAMCC driver is simply not built.
Warning backtrace example:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000000001a2
pc : dev_pm_domain_detach+0x8/0x48
lr : camss_probe+0x374/0x9c0
Call trace:
dev_pm_domain_detach+0x8/0x48
platform_probe+0x70/0xf0
really_probe+0xc4/0x2a8
__driver_probe_device+0x80/0x140
driver_probe_device+0x48/0x170
__device_attach_driver+0xc0/0x148
bus_for_each_drv+0x88/0xf0
__device_attach+0xb0/0x1c0
device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x30
bus_probe_device+0xb4/0xc0
deferred_probe_work_func+0x90/0xd0
process_one_work+0x164/0x3e0
worker_thread+0x310/0x420
kthread+0x120/0x130
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it