In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: tun: fix tun_napi_alloc_frags()
syzbot reported the following crash [1]
Issue came with the blamed commit. Instead of going through
all the iov components, we keep using the first one
and end up with a malformed skb.
[1]
kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:2849 !
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6230 Comm: syz-executor132 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-syzkaller-00407-g96b6fcc0ee41 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/25/2024
RIP: 0010:__pskb_pull_tail+0x1568/0x1570 net/core/skbuff.c:2848
Code: 38 c1 0f 8c 32 f1 ff ff 4c 89 f7 e8 92 96 74 f8 e9 25 f1 ff ff e8 e8 ae 09 f8 48 8b 5c 24 08 e9 eb fb ff ff e8 d9 ae 09 f8 90 <0f> 0b 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 0018:ffffc90004cbef30 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: ffffffff8995c347 RBX: 00000000fffffff2 RCX: ffff88802cf45a00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000fffffff2 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffff88807df0c06a R08: ffffffff8995b084 R09: 1ffff1100fbe185c
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100fbe185d R12: ffff888076e85d50
R13: ffff888076e85c80 R14: ffff888076e85cf4 R15: ffff888076e85c80
FS: 00007f0dca6ea6c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b8600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f0dca6ead58 CR3: 00000000119da000 CR4: 00000000003526f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
skb_cow_data+0x2da/0xcb0 net/core/skbuff.c:5284
tipc_aead_decrypt net/tipc/crypto.c:894 [inline]
tipc_crypto_rcv+0x402/0x24e0 net/tipc/crypto.c:1844
tipc_rcv+0x57e/0x12a0 net/tipc/node.c:2109
tipc_l2_rcv_msg+0x2bd/0x450 net/tipc/bearer.c:668
__netif_receive_skb_list_ptype net/core/dev.c:5720 [inline]
__netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x8b7/0x980 net/core/dev.c:5762
__netif_receive_skb_list net/core/dev.c:5814 [inline]
netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0xa51/0xe30 net/core/dev.c:5905
gro_normal_list include/net/gro.h:515 [inline]
napi_complete_done+0x2b5/0x870 net/core/dev.c:6256
napi_complete include/linux/netdevice.h:567 [inline]
tun_get_user+0x2ea0/0x4890 drivers/net/tun.c:1982
tun_chr_write_iter+0x10d/0x1f0 drivers/net/tun.c:2057
do_iter_readv_writev+0x600/0x880
vfs_writev+0x376/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:1050
do_writev+0x1b6/0x360 fs/read_write.c:1096
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it