CVE-2024-55642

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-01-11. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-52834 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6mfj-59wv-v5jx (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

block: Prevent potential deadlocks in zone write plug error recovery

Zone write plugging for handling writes to zones of a zoned block device always execute a zone report whenever a write BIO to a zone fails. The intent of this is to ensure that the tracking of a zone write pointer is always correct to ensure that the alignment to a zone write pointer of write BIOs can be checked on submission and that we can always correctly emulate zone append operations using regular write BIOs.

However, this error recovery scheme introduces a potential deadlock if a device queue freeze is initiated while BIOs are still plugged in a zone write plug and one of these write operation fails. In such case, the disk zone write plug error recovery work is scheduled and executes a report zone. This in turn can result in a request allocation in the underlying driver to issue the report zones command to the device. But with the device queue freeze already started, this allocation will block, preventing the report zone execution and the continuation of the processing of the plugged BIOs. As plugged BIOs hold a queue usage reference, the queue freeze itself will never complete, resulting in a deadlock.

Avoid this problem by completely removing from the zone write plugging code the use of report zones operations after a failed write operation, instead relying on the device user to either execute a report zones, reset the zone, finish the zone, or give up writing to the device (which is a fairly common pattern for file systems which degrade to read-only after write failures). This is not an unreasonnable requirement as all well-behaved applications, FSes and device mapper already use report zones to recover from write errors whenever possible by comparing the current position of a zone write pointer with what their assumption about the position is.

The changes to remove the automatic error recovery are as follows:

  • Completely remove the error recovery work and its associated
resources (zone write plug list head, disk error list, and disk zone_wplugs_work work struct). This also removes the functions disk_zone_wplug_set_error() and disk_zone_wplug_clear_error().
  • Change the BLK_ZONE_WPLUG_ERROR zone write plug flag into
BLK_ZONE_WPLUG_NEED_WP_UPDATE. This new flag is set for a zone write plug whenever a write opration targetting the zone of the zone write plug fails. This flag indicates that the zone write pointer offset is not reliable and that it must be updated when the next report zone, reset zone, finish zone or disk revalidation is executed.
  • Modify blk_zone_write_plug_bio_endio() to set the
BLK_ZONE_WPLUG_NEED_WP_UPDATE flag for the target zone of a failed write BIO.
  • Modify the function disk_zone_wplug_set_wp_offset() to clear this
new flag, thus implementing recovery of a correct write pointer offset with the reset (all) zone and finish zone operations.
  • Modify blkdev_report_zones() to always use the disk_report_zones_cb()
callback so that disk_zone_wplug_sync_wp_offset() can be called for any zone marked with the BLK_ZONE_WPLUG_NEED_WP_UPDATE flag. This implements recovery of a correct write pointer offset for zone write plugs marked with BLK_ZONE_WPLUG_NEED_WP_UPDATE and within the range of the report zones operation executed by the user.
  • Modify blk_revalidate_seq_zone() to call
disk_zone_wplug_sync_wp_offset() for all sequential write required zones when a zoned block device is revalidated, thus always resolving any inconsistency between the write pointer offset of zone write plugs and the actual write pointer position of sequential zones.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

January 11, 2025

Last Modified

October 1, 2025

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-24.04b (6.11.0-1017.17) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-1011.12~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.11.0-21.21) @ oracular2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-64k (6.11.0-1011.12) @ oracular2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi (6.11.0-1010.10) @ oracular2026-10-24ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.12.6 (fixes >=6.10.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.6-1: fixed in 6.12.6-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.12.6-1: fixed in 6.12.6-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 95 of 195 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 5 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 100 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 03:08 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-24 03:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6mfj-59wv-v5jx · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 05:59 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-10-12 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  3. 2026-10-11 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  6. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  7. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 02:25 UTCOSV refresh
  15. 2026-10-02 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  17. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  19. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  20. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  25. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  26. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  27. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  28. 2026-09-13 23:50 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  30. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  31. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  32. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  33. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  34. 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  35. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  36. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  37. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  38. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  39. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  40. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  41. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  42. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  43. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  44. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  45. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  46. 2026-08-26 01:10 UTCOSV refresh
  47. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  48. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  49. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  50. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  51. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  52. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  53. 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  54. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  55. 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  56. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  57. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  58. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  59. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  60. 2026-08-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  61. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  62. 2026-08-09 17:40 UTCOSV refresh
  63. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  65. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  66. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  67. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  69. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  70. 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-55642?
CVE-2024-55642 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on January 11, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: Prevent potential deadlocks in zone write plug error recovery Zone write plugging for handling writes to zones of a zoned block device always execute a zone report whenever a write BIO to a zone fails. The intent of this is…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-55642 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-55642 was published on January 11, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 1, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-55642 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-55642 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-55642?
CVE-2024-55642 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-55642?
A fix for CVE-2024-55642 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-55642

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-55642?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.