CVE-2024-50118

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-11-05. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

btrfs: reject ro->rw reconfiguration if there are hard ro requirements

[BUG] Syzbot reports the following crash:

BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): disabling free space tree BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE (0x1) BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro feature flag for FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID (0x2) Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000003: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000018-0x000000000000001f] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:backup_super_roots fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1691 [inline] RIP: 0010:write_all_supers+0x97a/0x40f0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4041 Call Trace: btrfs_commit_transaction+0x1eae/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2530 btrfs_delete_free_space_tree+0x383/0x730 fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c:1312 btrfs_start_pre_rw_mount+0xf28/0x1300 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3012 btrfs_remount_rw fs/btrfs/super.c:1309 [inline] btrfs_reconfigure+0xae6/0x2d40 fs/btrfs/super.c:1534 btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount fs/btrfs/super.c:2020 [inline] btrfs_get_tree_subvol fs/btrfs/super.c:2079 [inline] btrfs_get_tree+0x918/0x1920 fs/btrfs/super.c:2115 vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x2b0 fs/super.c:1800 do_new_mount+0x2be/0xb40 fs/namespace.c:3472 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3812 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4020 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2d6/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3997 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

[CAUSE] To support mounting different subvolume with different RO/RW flags for the new mount APIs, btrfs introduced two workaround to support this feature:

  • Skip mount option/feature checks if we are mounting a different
subvolume
  • Reconfigure the fs to RW if the initial mount is RO

Combining these two, we can have the following sequence:

  • Mount the fs ro,rescue=all,clear_cache,space_cache=v1
rescue=all will mark the fs as hard read-only, so no v2 cache clearing will happen.
  • Mount a subvolume rw of the same fs.
We go into btrfs_get_tree_subvol(), but fc_mount() returns EBUSY because our new fc is RW, different from the original fs.

Now we enter btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount(), which switches the RO flag first so that we can grab the existing fs_info. Then we reconfigure the fs to RW.

  • During reconfiguration, option/features check is skipped
This means we will restart the v2 cache clearing, and convert back to v1 cache. This will trigger fs writes, and since the original fs has "rescue=all" option, it skips the csum tree read.

And eventually causing NULL pointer dereference in super block writeback.

[FIX] For reconfiguration caused by different subvolume RO/RW flags, ensure we always run btrfs_check_options() to ensure we have proper hard RO requirements met.

In fact the function btrfs_check_options() doesn't really do many complex checks, but hard RO requirement and some feature dependency checks, thus there is no special reason not to do the check for mount reconfiguration.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
9%
KEV
Not listed

Published

November 5, 2024

Last Modified

October 1, 2025

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 107 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-23 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-13 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-13 21:08 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-08 15:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-25 18:46 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-14 23:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-08 07:58 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-50118?
CVE-2024-50118 is a medium vulnerability published on November 5, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: reject ro->rw reconfiguration if there are hard ro requirements [BUG] Syzbot reports the following crash: BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): disabling free space tree BTRFS info (device loop0 state MCS): clearing compat-ro…
When was CVE-2024-50118 disclosed?
CVE-2024-50118 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on November 5, 2024, with the most recent update on October 1, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-50118 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-50118 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 91.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-50118?
CVE-2024-50118 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-50118?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-50118, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-50118

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-50118?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.