CVE-2024-50066

HIGHNVD 7.07.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-10-23. NVD baseline CVSS 7.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2024-45052 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-58m7-hfr6-rrx2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.0Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/mremap: fix move_normal_pmd/retract_page_tables race

In mremap(), move_page_tables() looks at the type of the PMD entry and the specified address range to figure out by which method the next chunk of page table entries should be moved.

At that point, the mmap_lock is held in write mode, but no rmap locks are held yet. For PMD entries that point to page tables and are fully covered by the source address range, move_pgt_entry(NORMAL_PMD, ...) is called, which first takes rmap locks, then does move_normal_pmd(). move_normal_pmd() takes the necessary page table locks at source and destination, then moves an entire page table from the source to the destination.

The problem is: The rmap locks, which protect against concurrent page table removal by retract_page_tables() in the THP code, are only taken after the PMD entry has been read and it has been decided how to move it. So we can race as follows (with two processes that have mappings of the same tmpfs file that is stored on a tmpfs mount with huge=advise); note that process A accesses page tables through the MM while process B does it through the file rmap:

process A process B ========= ========= mremap mremap_to move_vma move_page_tables get_old_pmd alloc_new_pmd * PREEMPT * madvise(MADV_COLLAPSE) do_madvise madvise_walk_vmas madvise_vma_behavior madvise_collapse hpage_collapse_scan_file collapse_file retract_page_tables i_mmap_lock_read(mapping) pmdp_collapse_flush i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping) move_pgt_entry(NORMAL_PMD, ...) take_rmap_locks move_normal_pmd drop_rmap_locks

When this happens, move_normal_pmd() can end up creating bogus PMD entries in the line pmd_populate(mm, new_pmd, pmd_pgtable(pmd)). The effect depends on arch-specific and machine-specific details; on x86, you can end up with physical page 0 mapped as a page table, which is likely exploitable for user->kernel privilege escalation.

Fix the race by letting process B recheck that the PMD still points to a page table after the rmap locks have been taken. Otherwise, we bail and let the caller fall back to the PTE-level copying path, which will then bail immediately at the pmd_none() check.

Bug reachability: Reaching this bug requires that you can create shmem/file THP mappings - anonymous THP uses different code that doesn't zap stuff under rmap locks. File THP is gated on an experimental config flag (CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS), so on normal distro kernels you need shmem THP to hit this bug. As far as I know, getting shmem THP normally requires that you can mount your own tmpfs with the right mount flags, which would require creating your own user+mount namespace; though I don't know if some distros maybe enable shmem THP by default or something like that.

Bug impact: This issue can likely be used for user->kernel privilege escalation when it is reachable.

CVSS v3
7.0
EG Score
7.0HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
48
EG Risk 48/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity70% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
10th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 23, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

mm/mremap: fix move_normal_pmd/retract_page_tables race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fa1066fc5d00cb9f1b0e83b7ff6ef98d26ba2aa
Web page

mm/mremap: fix move_normal_pmd/retract_page_tables race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1552ce9ce8af47c0fe911682e5e1855e25851ca9
Web page

mm/mremap: fix move_normal_pmd/retract_page_tables race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/17396e32f975130b3e6251f024c8807d192e4c3e

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-50066(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.5-1: fixed in 6.11.5-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.11.5-1: fixed in 6.11.5-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 213 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 119 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-27 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-27 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-58m7-hfr6-rrx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  10. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  11. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  14. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 18:06 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-19 18:06 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-19 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-58m7-hfr6-rrx2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.0
  22. 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-10-18 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  6. 2026-10-11 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-10-02 16:14 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  20. 2026-09-29 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  21. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 23:12 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  26. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  27. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  28. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  29. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  30. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  31. 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  33. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  34. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  35. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  36. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  37. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  38. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  39. 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  40. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  41. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  42. 2026-09-07 08:47 UTCOSV refresh
  43. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  44. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  45. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  46. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  47. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  48. 2026-09-01 04:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  49. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  50. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  51. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  52. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  53. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  54. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  55. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  56. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  57. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  58. 2026-08-20 18:01 UTCOSV refresh
  59. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  60. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  61. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  62. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  63. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  64. 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  65. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  66. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  67. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  68. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  69. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-50066?
CVE-2024-50066 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 23, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/mremap: fix move_normal_pmd/retract_page_tables race In mremap(), move_page_tables() looks at the type of the PMD entry and the specified address range to figure out by which method the next chunk of page table entries should be…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-50066 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-50066 was published on October 23, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-50066 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-50066 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (10th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-50066?
CVE-2024-50066 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-50066?
A fix for CVE-2024-50066 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-50066 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-50066

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-50066?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.