In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to truncate preallocated blocks in f2fs_file_open()
chenyuwen reports a f2fs bug as below:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000011
fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx+0x78/0x1e8
f2fs_grab_read_bio+0x78/0x208
f2fs_submit_page_read+0x44/0x154
f2fs_get_read_data_page+0x288/0x5f4
f2fs_get_lock_data_page+0x60/0x190
truncate_partial_data_page+0x108/0x4fc
f2fs_do_truncate_blocks+0x344/0x5f0
f2fs_truncate_blocks+0x6c/0x134
f2fs_truncate+0xd8/0x200
f2fs_iget+0x20c/0x5ac
do_garbage_collect+0x5d0/0xf6c
f2fs_gc+0x22c/0x6a4
f2fs_disable_checkpoint+0xc8/0x310
f2fs_fill_super+0x14bc/0x1764
mount_bdev+0x1b4/0x21c
f2fs_mount+0x20/0x30
legacy_get_tree+0x50/0xbc
vfs_get_tree+0x5c/0x1b0
do_new_mount+0x298/0x4cc
path_mount+0x33c/0x5fc
__arm64_sys_mount+0xcc/0x15c
invoke_syscall+0x60/0x150
el0_svc_common+0xb8/0xf8
do_el0_svc+0x28/0xa0
el0_svc+0x24/0x84
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0xec
It is because inode.i_crypt_info is not initialized during below path:
- mount
- f2fs_fill_super
- f2fs_disable_checkpoint
- f2fs_gc
- f2fs_iget
- f2fs_truncate
So, let's relocate truncation of preallocated blocks to f2fs_file_open(),
after fscrypt_file_open().
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it