A type check was missing when handling fonts in PDF.js, which would allow arbitrary JavaScript execution in the PDF.js context. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 126, Firefox ESR < 115.11, and Thunderbird < 115.11.
CVE-2024-4367
“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.
Score elevated to 8.9 because EPSS predicted 71% probability of exploitation within the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs) when EchelonGraph scored this CVE. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. Confidence: see factors.
Also known asEUVD-2024-1831 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-wgrm-67xf-hhpq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 71%
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.9HIGHhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 68EG Risk 68/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity88% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation71% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 71%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.9 is EPSS's lift toward 9.0 from its impact severity (EG Severity, CVSS 8.8 HIGH): a likelihood of exploitation, not impact.
- EG Severity
- 8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 71% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 14, 2024
Last Modified
May 12, 2026
Advisory Details (9)
Auto-updated May 12, 2026Stored XSS in PDF renderer · Issue #7928 · gogs/gogs · GitHub
https://github.com/gogs/gogs/issues/7928CVE-2024-4367 - Arbitrary JavaScript execution in PDF.js - Codean Labs
https://codeanlabs.com/blog/research/cve-2024-4367-arbitrary-js-execution-in-pdf-js/1893645 - (CVE-2024-4367) Arbitrary Javascript injection in PDF.js through FontMatrix
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893645Full Disclosure: OXAS-ADV-2024-0004: OX App Suite Security Advisory
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Aug/30Security Vulnerabilities fixed in Thunderbird 115.11 — Mozilla
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-23/Security Vulnerabilities fixed in Firefox ESR 115.11 — Mozilla
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-22/Security Vulnerabilities fixed in Firefox 126 — Mozilla
https://www.mozilla.org/security/advisories/mfsa2024-21/[SECURITY] [DLA 3817-1] thunderbird security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/05/msg00012.html[SECURITY] [DLA 3815-1] firefox-esr security update
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/05/msg00010.htmlVendor Advisories for CVE-2024-4367(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:59326Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: webkit2gtk3 security update
- RHSA-2026:59325Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: webkit2gtk3 security update
- RHSA-2026:58564Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: webkitgtk4 security update
- RHSA-2026:58550Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: webkit2gtk3 security update
- RHSA-2026:57348Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: webkit2gtk3 security update
- RHSA-2026:54634Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: webkit2gtk3 security update
- RHSA-2026:54572Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: webkit2gtk3 security update
- RHSA-2026:42062Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: webkit2gtk3 security update
- +12 more
Patch Availability(30)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(20 across 6 ecosystems)
Debian:11(5)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | 102.1.0esr-1 ... 91.9.1esr-1~deb9u1 (155 versions) |
| — |
| odoo | 14.0.0+dfsg.2-7, 14.0.0+dfsg.2-7+deb11u1 |
| — |
| thunderbird | 1:102.0.1-1 ... 1:91.9.0-1~deb9u1 (191 versions) |
| — |
| webkit2gtk | 2.32.3-1 ... 2.53.4-1 (246 versions) |
| — |
| wpewebkit | 2.32.3-2 ... 2.52.5-1 (90 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(4)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | 102.11.0esr-1 ... 115.9.1esr-1~deb12u1 (62 versions) |
| — |
| thunderbird | 1:102.11.0-1 ... 1:115.9.0-1~deb12u1 (76 versions) |
| — |
| webkit2gtk | 2.40.1-1 ... 2.53.92-1 (166 versions) |
| — |
| wpewebkit | 2.38.6-1 ... 2.52.6-1 (54 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(4)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | — |
| — |
| thunderbird | — |
| — |
| webkit2gtk | 2.48.3-1 ... 2.52.4-1 (48 versions) |
| — |
| wpewebkit | 2.48.3-1 ... 2.52.6-1 (20 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(4)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | — |
| — |
| thunderbird | — |
| — |
| webkit2gtk | 2.48.3-1 ... 2.52.5-1~deb13u1 (49 versions) |
| — |
| wpewebkit | 2.48.3-1 ... 2.52.4-1 (18 versions) |
| — |
Debian:10(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr | 102.1.0esr-1 ... 91.9.1esr-1~deb9u1 (257 versions) |
| — |
| thunderbird | 1:102.0.1-1 ... 1:91.9.0-1~deb9u1 (314 versions) |
| — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pdfjs-dist | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(8)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Red HatRHSA-2024:2881IMPORTANT2024-05-14
RHSA-2024:2881 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2024:2882IMPORTANT2024-05-14
RHSA-2024:2882 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2024:2883IMPORTANT2024-05-14
RHSA-2024:2883 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2024:2884IMPORTANT2024-05-14
RHSA-2024:2884 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2024:2885IMPORTANT2024-05-14
RHSA-2024:2885 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2024:2886IMPORTANT2024-05-14
RHSA-2024:2886 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2024:2887IMPORTANT2024-05-14
RHSA-2024:2887 — Important
- Red HatRHSA-2024:2888IMPORTANT2024-05-14
RHSA-2024:2888 — Important
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 89 of 165 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 11 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 76 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wgrm-67xf-hhpq · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
- 2026-11-01 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-20 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 19:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-18 07:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
Show 64 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-11 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 12:05 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-06 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 19:52 UTCEG score recompute▼ 0.10
- 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-17 18:20 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-29 18:43 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 71% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-13 05:38 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-28 13:50 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:40 UTCEG score recompute▲ 0.20
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-16 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-11 05:52 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 73% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(12 references, 10 shown)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 9 GitHub PoCs), as are 2 GitHub checker repositories. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- GitHub PoC1337rokudenashi/Odoo_PDFjs_CVE-2024-4367.pdfPublished Aug 25, 2025
Odoo ≤17 is vulnerable to CVE-2024-4367, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution via PDF.js.
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCAnomalousVectors/cve-2024-4367-pocPublished Jun 28, 2025
POC for PDF JS' CVE-2024-4367 vuln
Open source ↗ - Exploit-DBEDB-52273Published Apr 22, 2025
Firefox ESR 115.11 - PDF.js Arbitrary JavaScript execution
Open source ↗ - GitHub checkerexfil0/WEAPONIZING-CVE-2024-4367Published Jan 5, 2025
CVE-2024-4367 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) in PDF.js, allowing arbitrary JavaScript code execution due to insufficient type checks on the FontMatrix object within PDF files.
Open source ↗ - Open source ↗GitHub PoCMasamuneee/CVE-2024-4367-AnalysisPublished Sep 4, 2024
- GitHub PoCUnHackerEnCapital/PDFernetRemoteloPublished Jun 19, 2024
PoC - Prueba de Concepto de CVE-2024-4367 en conjunto al CVE-2023-38831 en un solo Script
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCsnyk-labs/pdfjs-vuln-demoPublished Jun 17, 2024
This project is intended to serve as a proof of concept to demonstrate exploiting the vulnerability in the PDF.js (pdfjs-dist) library reported in CVE-2024-4367
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCZombie-Kaiser/cve-2024-4367-PoC-fixedPublished Jun 13, 2024
PDF.js是由Mozilla维护的基于JavaScript的PDF查看器。此漏洞允许攻击者在打开恶意 PDF 文件后立即执行任意 JavaScript 代码。这会影响所有 Firefox 用户 (<126),因为 Firefox 使用 PDF.js 来显示 PDF 文件,但也严重影响了许多基于 Web 和 Electron 的应用程序,这些应用程序(间接)使用 PDF.js 进行预览功能。
Open source ↗ - GitHub checkerspaceraccoon/detect-cve-2024-4367Published May 22, 2024
YARA detection rule for CVE-2024-4367 arbitrary javascript execution in PDF.js
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoCclarkio/pdfjs-vuln-demoPublished May 22, 2024
This project is intended to serve as a proof of concept to demonstrate exploiting the vulnerability in the PDF.js (pdfjs-dist) library reported in CVE-2024-4367
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:pdfjs-dist · Debian:11:odoo
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2024:2881 · redhat:RHSA-2026:42062
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-4367?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-4367 published?
Is CVE-2024-4367 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-4367?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-4367?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-4367
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-4367?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.