Apollo Federation is an architecture for declaratively composing APIs into a unified graph. Each team can own their slice of the graph independently, empowering them to deliver autonomously and incrementally. Instances of @apollo/query-planner >=2.0.0 and <2.8.5 are impacted by a denial-of-service vulnerability. @apollo/gateway versions >=2.0.0 and < 2.8.5 and Apollo Router <1.52.1 are also impacted through their use of @apollo/query-panner. If @apollo/query-planner is asked to plan a sufficiently complex query, it may loop infinitely and never complete. This results in unbounded memory consumption and either a crash or out-of-memory (OOM) termination. This issue can be triggered if you have at least one non-@key field that can be resolved by multiple subgraphs. To identify these shared fields, the schema for each subgraph must be reviewed. The mechanism to identify shared fields varies based on the version of Federation your subgraphs are using. You can check if your subgraphs are using Federation 1 or Federation 2 by reviewing their schemas. Federation 2 subgraph schemas will contain a @link directive referencing the version of Federation being used while Federation 1 subgraphs will not. For example, in a Federation 2 subgraph, you will find a line like @link(url: "https://specs.apollo.dev/federation/v2.0"). If a similar @link directive is not present in your subgraph schema, it is using Federation 1. Note that a supergraph can contain a mix of Federation 1 and Federation 2 subgraphs. This issue results from the Apollo query planner attempting to use a Number exceeding Javascript’s Number.MAX_VALUE in some cases. In Javascript, Number.MAX_VALUE is (2^1024 - 2^971). When the query planner receives an inbound graphql request, it breaks the query into pieces and for each piece, generates a list of potential execution steps to solve the piece. These candidates represent the steps that the query planner will take to satisfy the pieces of the larger query. As part of normal operations, the query planner requires and calculates the number of possible query plans for the total query. That is, it needs the product of the number of query plan candidates for each piece of the query. Under normal circumstances, after generating all query plan candidates and calculating the number of all permutations, the query planner moves on to stack rank candidates and prune less-than-optimal options. In particularly complex queries, especially those where fields can be solved through multiple subgraphs, this can cause the number of all query plan permutations to balloon. In worst-case scenarios, this can end up being a number larger than Number.MAX_VALUE. In Javascript, if Number.MAX_VALUE is exceeded, Javascript represents the value as “infinity”. If the count of candidates is evaluated as infinity, the component of the query planner responsible for pruning less-than-optimal query plans does not actually prune candidates, causing the query planner to evaluate many orders of magnitude more query plan candidates than necessary. This issue has been addressed in @apollo/query-planner v2.8.5, @apollo/gateway v2.8.5, and Apollo Router v1.52.1. Users are advised to upgrade. This issue can be avoided by ensuring there are no fields resolvable from multiple subgraphs. If all subgraphs are using Federation 2, you can confirm that you are not impacted by ensuring that none of your subgraph schemas use the @shareable directive. If you are using Federation 1 subgraphs, you will need to validate that there are no fields resolvable by multiple subgraphs.
CVE-2024-43414
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-08-27. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2024-2576 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-fmj9-77q8-g6c4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation1.0% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 1.0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 62nd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 1.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 27, 2024
Last Modified
September 12, 2024
References (3)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/apollographql/federation/security/advisories/GHSA-fmj9-77q8-g6c4Exploit
- security-advisories@githubhttps://www.apollographql.com/docs/federation/query-plansTechnical Description
- security-advisories@githubhttps://www.apollographql.com/docs/router/configuration/persisted-queriesTechnical Description
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @apollo/gateway @ 2.8.5 (fixes >= 2.0.0, < 2.8.5) | — | ghsa |
| rust | apollo-router @ 1.52.1 (fixes < 1.52.1) | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 2 ecosystems)
npm(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| @apollo/gateway | — |
| — |
| @apollo/query-planner | — |
| — |
crates.io(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| apollo-router | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 96 of 209 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 113 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-11-01 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fmj9-77q8-g6c4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
- 2026-11-01 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-28 06:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-20 19:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-18 07:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
Show 71 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-12 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-11 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-10 01:03 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-09-30 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-21 20:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-20 09:33 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-09-01 12:34 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-15 12:07 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 59th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:@apollo/query-planner · npm:@apollo/gateway · crates.io:apollo-router
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-43414?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-43414 published?
Is CVE-2024-43414 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-43414?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-43414?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-43414
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-43414?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.