CVE-2024-40899

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2024-07-12. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2024-38710 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8jvx-wqf8-m6ph (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd()

We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore command:

================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888109164a80 by task ondemand-04-dae/4962

CPU: 11 PID: 4962 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-rc7-dirty #542 Call Trace: kasan_report+0x94/0xc0 cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0x609/0xab0 vfs_read+0x169/0xb50 ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0

Allocated by task 626: __kmalloc+0x1df/0x4b0 cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x24d/0x690 cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30 cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140 cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230 [...]

Freed by task 626: kfree+0xf1/0x2c0 cachefiles_ondemand_send_req+0x568/0x690 cachefiles_create_tmpfile+0x249/0xb30 cachefiles_create_file+0x6f/0x140 cachefiles_look_up_object+0x29c/0xa60 cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x37d/0xca0 fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230 [...] ==================================================================

Following is the process that triggers the issue:

mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2 ------------------------------------------------------------ cachefiles_ondemand_init_object cachefiles_ondemand_send_req REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len) wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)

cachefiles_daemon_read cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n) process_open_req(REQ_A) ------ restore ------ cachefiles_ondemand_restore xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX) xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);

cachefiles_daemon_read cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req

write(devfd, ("copen %u,%llu", msg->msg_id, size)); cachefiles_ondemand_copen xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id) complete(&REQ_A->done) kfree(REQ_A) cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd(REQ_A) fd = get_unused_fd_flags file = anon_inode_getfile fd_install(fd, file) load = (void *)REQ_A->msg.data; load->fd = fd; // load UAF !!!

This issue is caused by issuing a restore command when the daemon is still alive, which results in a request being processed multiple times thus triggering a UAF. So to avoid this problem, add an additional reference count to cachefiles_req, which is held while waiting and reading, and then released when the waiting and reading is over.

Note that since there is only one reference count for waiting, we need to avoid the same request being completed multiple times, so we can only complete the request if it is successfully removed from the xarray.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
20th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 12, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 20, 2026
Patch available.
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 4008-1] linux-6.1 security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html
Web page

cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de3e26f9e5b76fc628077578c001c4a51bf54d06
Web page

cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6de82765e12fb1201ab607f0d3ffe3309b30fc0
Web page

cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/99e9c5bd27ddefa0f9db88625bf5e31c1e833d62
Web page

cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d902d9a3aa4f2a8bda698294e34be788be012fc

Patch Availability(8)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-azure (6.8.0-1014.16) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k (6.8.0-1013.14.1) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi (6.8.0-1011.12) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-1013.14~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-44.44.1~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-24.04-edge (6.8.0-44.44) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-45.45~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.9.6 (fixes >=6.8.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1, 6.1.106-3~deb11u2, 6.1.106-3~deb11u3, 6.1.112-1~deb11u1
  • every version up to 6.1.119-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.119-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.27-1 ... 6.1.98-1 (25 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.99-1: fixed in 6.1.99-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.9.7-1: fixed in 6.9.7-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.9.7-1: fixed in 6.9.7-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 210 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 114 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-27 23:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jvx-wqf8-m6ph · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  8. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  9. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  13. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  15. 2026-10-21 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  16. 2026-10-20 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-20 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-20 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8jvx-wqf8-m6ph · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  19. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 07:08 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  24. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 17:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  5. 2026-10-11 21:13 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 14:03 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  15. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  16. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  17. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  18. 2026-09-30 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  20. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  21. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  22. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  24. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  26. 2026-09-22 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  27. 2026-09-21 20:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  28. 2026-09-20 23:36 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  30. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  31. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  33. 2026-09-16 05:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  34. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  35. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  36. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  37. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  38. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  39. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  40. 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  41. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  42. 2026-09-05 15:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  43. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  44. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  45. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  46. 2026-09-01 23:15 UTCOSV refresh
  47. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  48. 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  49. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  50. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  51. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  52. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  53. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  54. 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  55. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  56. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  57. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  58. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  59. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  60. 2026-08-16 01:07 UTCOSV refresh
  61. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  62. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  63. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  64. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  65. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  66. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  67. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  68. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  69. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  70. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  71. 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-40899?
CVE-2024-40899 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 12, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_get_fd() We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore command: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN:…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-40899 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-40899 was published on July 12, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-40899 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-40899 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-40899?
CVE-2024-40899 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-40899?
A fix for CVE-2024-40899 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-40899

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-40899?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.