CVE-2024-39500

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-07-12. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2024-38026 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-hrxv-7xrv-h5rv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sock_map: avoid race between sock_map_close and sk_psock_put

sk_psock_get will return NULL if the refcount of psock has gone to 0, which will happen when the last call of sk_psock_put is done. However, sk_psock_drop may not have finished yet, so the close callback will still point to sock_map_close despite psock being NULL.

This can be reproduced with a thread deleting an element from the sock map, while the second one creates a socket, adds it to the map and closes it.

That will trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE:

------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7220 at net/core/sock_map.c:1701 sock_map_close+0x2a2/0x2d0 net/core/sock_map.c:1701 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 7220 Comm: syz-executor380 Not tainted 6.9.0-syzkaller-07726-g3c999d1ae3c7 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 RIP: 0010:sock_map_close+0x2a2/0x2d0 net/core/sock_map.c:1701 Code: df e8 92 29 88 f8 48 8b 1b 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 20 00 74 08 48 89 df e8 79 29 88 f8 4c 8b 23 eb 89 e8 4f 15 23 f8 90 <0f> 0b 90 48 83 c4 08 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d e9 13 26 3d 02 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000441fda8 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff89731ae1 RBX: ffffffff94b87540 RCX: ffff888029470000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff8bcab5c0 RDI: ffffffff8c1faba0 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffffffff92f9b61f R09: 1ffffffff25f36c3 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffffbfff25f36c4 R12: ffffffff89731840 R13: ffff88804b587000 R14: ffff88804b587000 R15: ffffffff89731870 FS: 000055555e080380(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000207d4000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: unix_release+0x87/0xc0 net/unix/af_unix.c:1048 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xbe/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x42b/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 __do_sys_close fs/open.c:1556 [inline] __se_sys_close fs/open.c:1541 [inline] __x64_sys_close+0x7f/0x110 fs/open.c:1541 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fb37d618070 Code: 00 00 48 c7 c2 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb d4 e8 10 2c 00 00 80 3d 31 f0 07 00 00 74 17 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 48 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 83 ec 18 89 7c RSP: 002b:00007ffcd4a525d8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007fb37d618070 RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 00000000200001c0 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000100000000 R09: 0000000100000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000

Use sk_psock, which will only check that the pointer is not been set to NULL yet, which should only happen after the callbacks are restored. If, then, a reference can still be gotten, we may call sk_psock_stop and cancel psock->work.

As suggested by Paolo Abeni, reorder the condition so the control flow is less convoluted.

After that change, the reproducer does not trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE anymore.

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity47% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 12, 2024

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-39500(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (498 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1, 6.1.106-3~deb11u2, 6.1.106-3~deb11u3, 6.1.112-1~deb11u1
  • every version up to 6.1.119-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.119-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.27-1 ... 6.1.98-1 (25 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.99-1: fixed in 6.1.99-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.9.7-1: fixed in 6.9.7-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.9.7-1: fixed in 6.9.7-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 216 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 120 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 06:04 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 06:04 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-24 06:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hrxv-7xrv-h5rv · GitHub CVSS 4.7
  14. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 18:55 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 07:09 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-12 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-11 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-08 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-09-30 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  20. 2026-09-27 00:11 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-09-26 00:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  25. 2026-09-22 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  26. 2026-09-21 20:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  27. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  28. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  29. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  31. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  32. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  33. 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  34. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  35. 2026-09-11 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  36. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  37. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  38. 2026-09-07 09:48 UTCOSV refresh
  39. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  40. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  41. 2026-09-04 13:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  43. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  45. 2026-09-01 04:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  46. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  48. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  49. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  50. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  51. 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  52. 2026-08-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  53. 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  54. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  55. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  56. 2026-08-20 19:01 UTCOSV refresh
  57. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  58. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  59. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  60. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  61. 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  62. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  63. 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  64. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  65. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  66. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  67. 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  68. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  69. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  70. 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  71. 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-39500?
CVE-2024-39500 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 12, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sock_map: avoid race between sock_map_close and sk_psock_put sk_psock_get will return NULL if the refcount of psock has gone to 0, which will happen when the last call of sk_psock_put is done. However, sk_psock_drop may not have…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-39500 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-39500 was published on July 12, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-39500 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-39500 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-39500?
CVE-2024-39500 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-39500?
A fix for CVE-2024-39500 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2024-39500 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-39500

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-39500?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.