CVE-2024-38439

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2024-06-16. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2024-37331 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.9%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Netatalk before 3.2.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant heap-based buffer overflow because of setting ibuf[PASSWDLEN] to '\0' in FPLoginExt in login in etc/uams/uams_pam.c. 2.4.1 and 3.1.19 are also fixed versions.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.9%
EPSS %ILE
60th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 16, 2024

Last Modified

November 3, 2025

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 9, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
Web page

Netatalk - Netatalk Security Advisory

https://netatalk.io/security/CVE-2024-38439
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

[SECURITY] [DLA 3968-1] netatalk security update

https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/11/msg00026.html
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Heap out-of-bounds write in uams_pam.c · Advisory · Netatalk/netatalk · GitHub

https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/security/advisories/GHSA-8r68-857c-4rqc
Web page

GitHub · Where software is built

https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/issues/1096
Web page

netatalk/etc/uams/uams_pam.c at 90d91a9ac9a7d6132ab7620d31c8c23400949206 · Netatalk/netatalk · GitHub

https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk/blob/90d91a9ac9a7d6132ab7620d31c8c23400949206/etc/uams/uams_pam.c#L316

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntunetatalk (2.2.5-1ubuntu0.2+esm2) @ xenial2026-11-02ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
netatalk3.1.12~ds-8, 3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1
  • every version up to 3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u2: fixed in 3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u2
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
netatalk—
  • every version up to 3.1.18~ds-2: fixed in 3.1.18~ds-2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
netatalk—
  • every version up to 3.1.18~ds-2: fixed in 3.1.18~ds-2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 83× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 262 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 164 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 01:10 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 01:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  8. 2026-10-30 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-30 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-30 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  11. 2026-10-29 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-29 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-29 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  15. 2026-10-28 20:20 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-28 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-28 20:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-27 18:39 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-27 18:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  23. 2026-10-26 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-26 17:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-25 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-25 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  6. 2026-10-24 13:35 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-24 13:35 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-24 13:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  10. 2026-10-23 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-23 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-23 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-22 10:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 08:44 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-21 08:44 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-21 08:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  21. 2026-10-20 07:08 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-20 07:08 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-20 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  25. 2026-10-19 05:31 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-19 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-18 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  28. 2026-10-18 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-18 03:54 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-18 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-17 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  32. 2026-10-17 02:18 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-17 02:18 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-17 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  36. 2026-10-16 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-10-16 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-15 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  39. 2026-10-14 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-14 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  42. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  43. 2026-10-13 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  44. 2026-10-12 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  46. 2026-10-12 14:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pcmr-ff73-xcj5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-11 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-10-11 16:08 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  50. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  51. 2026-10-10 16:03 UTCOSV refresh
  52. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  53. 2026-10-08 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  54. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  55. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  56. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  57. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  58. 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  59. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  60. 2026-09-30 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  62. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  63. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  64. 2026-09-27 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  65. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  66. 2026-09-26 00:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  67. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  68. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  69. 2026-09-22 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  70. 2026-09-21 20:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  71. 2026-09-21 03:15 UTCOSV refresh
  72. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  73. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-38439?
CVE-2024-38439 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 16, 2024. Netatalk before 3.2.1 has an off-by-one error and resultant heap-based buffer overflow because of setting ibuf[PASSWDLEN] to '\0' in FPLoginExt in login in etc/uams/uams_pam.c. 2.4.1 and 3.1.19 are also fixed versions.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-38439 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2024-38439 was published on June 16, 2024. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-38439 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-38439 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (60th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-38439?
CVE-2024-38439 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-38439?
A fix for CVE-2024-38439 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-38439

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-38439?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.