In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix div-by-zero in l2cap_le_flowctl_init()
l2cap_le_flowctl_init() can cause both div-by-zero and an integer
overflow since hdev->le_mtu may not fall in the valid range.
Move MTU from hci_dev to hci_conn to validate MTU and stop the connection
process earlier if MTU is invalid.
Also, add a missing validation in read_buffer_size() and make it return
an error value if the validation fails.
Now hci_conn_add() returns ERR_PTR() as it can fail due to the both a
kzalloc failure and invalid MTU value.
divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 PID: 67 Comm: kworker/u5:0 Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc5+ #20
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
RIP: 0010:l2cap_le_flowctl_init+0x19e/0x3f0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:547
Code: e8 17 17 0c 00 66 41 89 9f 84 00 00 00 bf 01 00 00 00 41 b8 02 00 00 00 4c
89 fe 4c 89 e2 89 d9 e8 27 17 0c 00 44 89 f0 31 d2 <66> f7 f3 89 c3 ff c3 4d 8d
b7 88 00 00 00 4c 89 f0 48 c1 e8 03 42
RSP: 0018:ffff88810bc0f858 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 00000000000002a0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: dffffc0000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88810bc0f7c0 RDI: ffffc90002dcb66f
RBP: ffff88810bc0f880 R08: aa69db2dda70ff01 R09: 0000ffaaaaaaaaaa
R10: 0084000000ffaaaa R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88810d65a084
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 00000000000002a0 R15: ffff88810d65a000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811ac00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000020000100 CR3: 0000000103268003 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
l2cap_le_connect_req net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:4902 [inline]
l2cap_le_sig_cmd net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5420 [inline]
l2cap_le_sig_channel net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:5486 [inline]
l2cap_recv_frame+0xe59d/0x11710 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:6809
l2cap_recv_acldata+0x544/0x10a0 net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c:7506
hci_acldata_packet net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:3939 [inline]
hci_rx_work+0x5e5/0xb20 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4176
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0x90f/0x1530 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
worker_thread+0x926/0xe70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2e3/0x380 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x5c/0x90 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it