In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: ufs: core: Fix shift issue in ufshcd_clear_cmd()
When task_tag >= 32 (in MCQ mode) and sizeof(unsigned int) == 4, 1U <<
task_tag will out of bounds for a u32 mask. Fix this up to prevent
SHIFT_ISSUE (bitwise shifts that are out of bounds for their data type).
[name:debug_monitors&]Unexpected kernel BRK exception at EL1
[name:traps&]Internal error: BRK handler: 00000000f2005514 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[name:mediatek_cpufreq_hw&]cpufreq stop DVFS log done
[name:mrdump&]Kernel Offset: 0x1ba5800000 from 0xffffffc008000000
[name:mrdump&]PHYS_OFFSET: 0x80000000
[name:mrdump&]pstate: 22400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO)
[name:mrdump&]pc : [0xffffffdbaf52bb2c] ufshcd_clear_cmd+0x280/0x288
[name:mrdump&]lr : [0xffffffdbaf52a774] ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd+0x3e4/0x82c
[name:mrdump&]sp : ffffffc0081471b0
Workqueue: ufs_eh_wq_0 ufshcd_err_handler
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0xf8/0x144
show_stack+0x18/0x24
dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x9c
dump_stack+0x18/0x44
mrdump_common_die+0x254/0x480 [mrdump]
ipanic_die+0x20/0x30 [mrdump]
notify_die+0x15c/0x204
die+0x10c/0x5f8
arm64_notify_die+0x74/0x13c
do_debug_exception+0x164/0x26c
el1_dbg+0x64/0x80
el1h_64_sync_handler+0x3c/0x90
el1h_64_sync+0x68/0x6c
ufshcd_clear_cmd+0x280/0x288
ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd+0x3e4/0x82c
ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd+0x5bc/0x9ac
ufshcd_verify_dev_init+0x84/0x1c8
ufshcd_probe_hba+0x724/0x1ce0
ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore+0x260/0x574
ufshcd_reset_and_restore+0x138/0xbd0
ufshcd_err_handler+0x1218/0x2f28
process_one_work+0x5fc/0x1140
worker_thread+0x7d8/0xe20
kthread+0x25c/0x468
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it