In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dmaengine: fsl-qdma: init irq after reg initialization
Initialize the qDMA irqs after the registers are configured so that
interrupts that may have been pending from a primary kernel don't get
processed by the irq handler before it is ready to and cause panic with
the following trace:
Call trace:
fsl_qdma_queue_handler+0xf8/0x3e8
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x2b0
handle_irq_event_percpu+0x1c/0x68
handle_irq_event+0x44/0x78
handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc8/0x178
generic_handle_irq+0x24/0x38
__handle_domain_irq+0x90/0x100
gic_handle_irq+0x5c/0xb8
el1_irq+0xb8/0x180
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x14/0x40
__setup_irq+0x4bc/0x798
request_threaded_irq+0xd8/0x190
devm_request_threaded_irq+0x74/0xe8
fsl_qdma_probe+0x4d4/0xca8
platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa0
really_probe+0xe0/0x3f8
driver_probe_device+0x64/0x130
device_driver_attach+0x6c/0x78
__driver_attach+0xbc/0x158
bus_for_each_dev+0x5c/0x98
driver_attach+0x20/0x28
bus_add_driver+0x158/0x220
driver_register+0x60/0x110
__platform_driver_register+0x44/0x50
fsl_qdma_driver_init+0x18/0x20
do_one_initcall+0x48/0x258
kernel_init_freeable+0x1a4/0x23c
kernel_init+0x10/0xf8
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it