In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/vmscan: fix a bug calling wakeup_kswapd() with a wrong zone index
With numa balancing on, when a numa system is running where a numa node
doesn't have its local memory so it has no managed zones, the following
oops has been observed. It's because wakeup_kswapd() is called with a
wrong zone index, -1. Fixed it by checking the index before calling
wakeup_kswapd().
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000033f3
> #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> PGD 0 P4D 0
> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> CPU: 2 PID: 895 Comm: masim Not tainted 6.6.0-dirty #255
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> RIP: 0010:wakeup_kswapd (./linux/mm/vmscan.c:7812)
> Code: (omitted)
> RSP: 0000:ffffc90004257d58 EFLAGS: 00010286
> RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff88883fff0480 RCX: 0000000000000003
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88883fff0480
> RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: ff0003ffffffffff R09: ffffffffffffffff
> R10: ffff888106c95540 R11: 0000000055555554 R12: 0000000000000003
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88883fff0940
> FS: 00007fc4b8124740(0000) GS:ffff888827c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 00000000000033f3 CR3: 000000026cc08004 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> PKRU: 55555554
> Call Trace:
>
> ? __die
> ? page_fault_oops
> ? __pte_offset_map_lock
> ? exc_page_fault
> ? asm_exc_page_fault
> ? wakeup_kswapd
> migrate_misplaced_page
> __handle_mm_fault
> handle_mm_fault
> do_user_addr_fault
> exc_page_fault
> asm_exc_page_fault
> RIP: 0033:0x55b897ba0808
> Code: (omitted)
> RSP: 002b:00007ffeefa821a0 EFLAGS: 00010287
> RAX: 000055b89983acd0 RBX: 00007ffeefa823f8 RCX: 000055b89983acd0
> RDX: 00007fc2f8122010 RSI: 0000000000020000 RDI: 000055b89983acd0
> RBP: 00007ffeefa821a0 R08: 0000000000000037 R09: 0000000000000075
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007ffeefa82410 R14: 000055b897ba5dd8 R15: 00007fc4b8340000
>
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it