CVE-2024-26676

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2024-04-02. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

af_unix: Call kfree_skb() for dead unix_(sk)->oob_skb in GC.

syzbot reported a warning [0] in __unix_gc() with a repro, which creates a socketpair and sends one socket's fd to itself using the peer.

socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, [3, 4]) = 0 sendmsg(4, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\360", iov_len=1}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_control=[{cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, cmsg_data=[3]}], msg_controllen=24, msg_flags=0}, MSG_OOB|MSG_PROBE|MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_ZEROCOPY) = 1

This forms a self-cyclic reference that GC should finally untangle but does not due to lack of MSG_OOB handling, resulting in memory leak.

Recently, commit 11498715f266 ("af_unix: Remove io_uring code for GC.") removed io_uring's dead code in GC and revealed the problem.

The code was executed at the final stage of GC and unconditionally moved all GC candidates from gc_candidates to gc_inflight_list. That papered over the reported problem by always making the following WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&gc_candidates)) false.

The problem has been there since commit 2aab4b969002 ("af_unix: fix struct pid leaks in OOB support") added full scm support for MSG_OOB while fixing another bug.

To fix this problem, we must call kfree_skb() for unix_sk(sk)->oob_skb if the socket still exists in gc_candidates after purging collected skb.

Then, we need to set NULL to oob_skb before calling kfree_skb() because it calls last fput() and triggers unix_release_sock(), where we call duplicate kfree_skb(u->oob_skb) if not NULL.

Note that the leaked socket remained being linked to a global list, so kmemleak also could not detect it. We need to check /proc/net/protocol to notice the unfreed socket.

[0]: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2863 at net/unix/garbage.c:345 __unix_gc+0xc74/0xe80 net/unix/garbage.c:345 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 2863 Comm: kworker/u4:11 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc1-syzkaller-00583-g1701940b1a02 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 Workqueue: events_unbound __unix_gc RIP: 0010:__unix_gc+0xc74/0xe80 net/unix/garbage.c:345 Code: 8b 5c 24 50 e9 86 f8 ff ff e8 f8 e4 22 f8 31 d2 48 c7 c6 30 6a 69 89 4c 89 ef e8 97 ef ff ff e9 80 f9 ff ff e8 dd e4 22 f8 90 <0f> 0b 90 e9 7b fd ff ff 48 89 df e8 5c e7 7c f8 e9 d3 f8 ff ff e8 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000b03fba0 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9000b03fc10 RCX: ffffffff816c493e RDX: ffff88802c02d940 RSI: ffffffff896982f3 RDI: ffffc9000b03fb30 RBP: ffffc9000b03fce0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff52001607f66 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffffc9000b03fc10 R14: ffffc9000b03fc10 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005559c8677a60 CR3: 000000000d57a000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: process_one_work+0x889/0x15e0 kernel/workqueue.c:2633 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2706 [inline] worker_thread+0x8b9/0x12a0 kernel/workqueue.c:2787 kthread+0x2c6/0x3b0 kernel/kthread.c:388 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:242

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
14%
KEV
Not listed

Published

April 2, 2024

Last Modified

May 7, 2025

Patch Availability(11)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 113 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-14 15:25 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-09 19:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-26 16:09 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-23 21:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-17 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-08 23:07 UTCOSV refresh
  53. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-26676?
CVE-2024-26676 is a medium vulnerability published on April 2, 2024. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afunix: Call kfreeskb() for dead unix(sk)->oobskb in GC. syzbot reported a warning [0] in unix_gc() with a repro, which creates a socketpair and sends one socket's fd to itself using the peer. socketpair(AFUNIX, SOCKSTREAM, 0, [3,…
When was CVE-2024-26676 disclosed?
CVE-2024-26676 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on April 2, 2024, with the most recent update on May 7, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2024-26676 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-26676 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 86.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-26676?
CVE-2024-26676 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-26676?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2024-26676, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-26676

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-26676?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.