An improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via via crafted API requests.
CVE-2024-23108
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2024-02-05. NVD baseline CVSS 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2024-20633 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 80%
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
Please upgrade to FortiSIEM version 7.1.2 or above (from the CVE record's solution, Fortinet, Inc.) — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 92EG Risk 92/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation80% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: Please upgrade to FortiSIEM version 7.1.2 or above (from the CVE record's solution, Fortinet, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 80%
- EPSS %ILE
- 99th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 80% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Please upgrade to FortiSIEM version 7.1.2 or above (from the CVE record's solution, Fortinet, Inc.). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
February 5, 2024
Last Modified
January 14, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Nov 1, 2026GitHub - horizon3ai/CVE-2024-23108: CVE-2024-23108: Fortinet FortiSIEM Unauthenticated 2nd Order Command Injection · GitHub
https://github.com/horizon3ai/CVE-2024-23108Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 64× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 131 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 32 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-02 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-01 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-31 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-30 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-29 22:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 22:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-29 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 00:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-28 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-28 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-27 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-26 02:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-25 17:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-25 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-24 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 06:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-23 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-22 11:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 11:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-21 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-20 15:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 15:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-19 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-18 18:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-18 07:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-16 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-15 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-14 12:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-13 12:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-chj3-8q43-rcc8 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-11 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 80% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-30 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 78% · 99th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(3 references)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 GitHub PoCs), as is 1 Nuclei detection template. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.
- Nucleinetwork/cves/2024/CVE-2024-23108.yamlPublished Oct 29, 2025
Fortinet FortiSIEM - OS Command Injection
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoChitem/CVE-2024-23108Published May 28, 2024
POC iteration for CVE-2024-23108 which can use -l for list input
Open source ↗ - GitHub PoChorizon3ai/CVE-2024-23108Published May 20, 2024
CVE-2024-23108: Fortinet FortiSIEM Unauthenticated 2nd Order Command Injection
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-78
- CVE-2024-23109EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-24091EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-22836EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-1115EG 7.3HIGH
- CVE-2024-24333EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-24332EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-24331EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-24330EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-24329EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-24328EG 9.8EPSS p93CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-23108?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-23108 published?
Is CVE-2024-23108 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-23108?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-23108?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2024-23108
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-23108?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.