CVE-2024-1651

CRITICALNVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2024-02-20. NVD baseline CVSS 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2024-0524 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 34%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

Torrentpier version 2.4.1 allows executing arbitrary commands on the server.

This is possible because the application is vulnerable to insecure deserialization.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
76
EG Risk 76/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
34%
EPSS %ILE
98th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
34% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-01). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 20, 2024

Last Modified

February 12, 2025

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Nov 1, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

GitHub - torrentpier/torrentpier: 🐂 TorrentPier. Bull-powered BitTorrent tracker engine · GitHub

https://github.com/torrentpier/torrentpier
Web pageMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2024-1651: Torrentpier 2.4.1 Deserialization | Fluid Attacks

https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/xavi/

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
composertorrentpier/torrentpier—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
torrentpier/torrentpier2.3.0.4-beta ... v2.4.1 (24 versions)
  • every version through 2.4.1: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 69× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 96 of 208 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 4 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 112 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 09:46 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 09:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  3. 2026-11-01 09:24 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-11-01 09:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  5. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  6. 2026-10-31 09:04 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-31 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  8. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  9. 2026-10-30 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-30 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  11. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  12. 2026-10-29 08:22 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-29 08:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  14. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  15. 2026-10-28 08:00 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-28 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  17. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  18. 2026-10-27 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-27 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  20. 2026-10-26 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  21. 2026-10-25 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 04:09 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-25 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  25. 2026-10-24 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
Show 71 more
  1. 2026-10-24 03:46 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-24 03:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  3. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-23 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  6. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  7. 2026-10-22 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-22 03:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  9. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 02:39 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-21 02:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  12. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-20 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  15. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-19 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  18. 2026-10-18 07:30 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-18 01:12 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-18 01:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  21. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  22. 2026-10-17 00:50 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  24. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  25. 2026-10-16 00:28 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-16 00:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  27. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  28. 2026-10-14 19:02 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-14 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  30. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  31. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  32. 2026-10-13 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-13 15:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  34. 2026-10-12 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-12 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rwm-2xw8-hh9p · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
  36. 2026-10-11 23:54 UTCOSV refresh
  37. 2026-10-11 21:29 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-11 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  40. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  41. 2026-10-08 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  42. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  43. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  44. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  45. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  46. 2026-09-30 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  48. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  49. 2026-09-26 00:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  50. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  51. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  52. 2026-09-22 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  53. 2026-09-22 07:46 UTCOSV refresh
  54. 2026-09-19 15:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  55. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  56. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  57. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  58. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  59. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  60. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  61. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  62. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  63. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  64. 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  65. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  66. 2026-09-03 05:00 UTCOSV refresh
  67. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  68. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  69. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  70. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile
  71. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 34% · 98th percentile

Publicly available exploits

(2 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (2 GitHub PoCs). No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.

  • GitHub PoChy011121/CVE-2024-1651-exploit-RCE
    Published Feb 29, 2024

    (Mirorring)

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCsharpicx/CVE-2024-1651-PoC
    Published Feb 23, 2024

    Torrentpier v2.4.1. CVE-2024-1651. Remote Code Execution (RCE). Exploit.

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2024-1651?
CVE-2024-1651 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 20, 2024. Torrentpier version 2.4.1 allows executing arbitrary commands on the server. This is possible because the application is vulnerable to insecure deserialization.
When was CVE-2024-1651 made public?
CVE-2024-1651 was made public on February 19, 2024: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Fluid Attacks, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on February 20, 2024. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of February 12, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2024-1651 actively exploited?
CVE-2024-1651 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 34% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (98th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-1651?
CVE-2024-1651 has a CVSS v3 base score of 10.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2024-1651?
No fix for CVE-2024-1651 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch for a fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-1651

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-1651?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.