In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfsd: move init of percpu reply_cache_stats counters back to nfsd_init_net
Commit f5f9d4a314da ("nfsd: move reply cache initialization into nfsd
startup") moved the initialization of the reply cache into nfsd startup,
but didn't account for the stats counters, which can be accessed before
nfsd is ever started. The result can be a NULL pointer dereference when
someone accesses /proc/fs/nfsd/reply_cache_stats while nfsd is still
shut down.
This is a regression and a user-triggerable oops in the right situation:
- non-x86_64 arch
- /proc/fs/nfsd is mounted in the namespace
- nfsd is not started in the namespace
- unprivileged user calls "cat /proc/fs/nfsd/reply_cache_stats"
Although this is easy to trigger on some arches (like aarch64), on
x86_64, calling this_cpu_ptr(NULL) evidently returns a pointer to the
fixed_percpu_data. That struct looks just enough like a newly
initialized percpu var to allow nfsd_reply_cache_stats_show to access
it without Oopsing.
Move the initialization of the per-net+per-cpu reply-cache counters
back into nfsd_init_net, while leaving the rest of the reply cache
allocations to be done at nfsd startup time.
Kudos to Eirik who did most of the legwork to track this down.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it