CVE-2023-54271

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asEUVD-2023-60370 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jw53-vfm2-vf66 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

blk-cgroup: Fix NULL deref caused by blkg_policy_data being installed before init

blk-iocost sometimes causes the following crash:

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000e0 ... RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock+0x17/0x30 Code: be 01 02 00 00 e8 79 38 39 ff 31 d2 89 d0 5d c3 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 65 ff 05 48 d0 34 7e b9 01 00 00 00 31 c0 0f b1 0f 75 02 5d c3 89 c6 e8 ea 04 00 00 5d c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc900023b3d40 EFLAGS: 00010046 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000000e0 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: ffffc900023b3d20 RSI: ffffc900023b3cf0 RDI: 00000000000000e0 RBP: ffffc900023b3d40 R08: ffffc900023b3c10 R09: 0000000000000003 R10: 0000000000000064 R11: 000000000000000a R12: ffff888102337000 R13: fffffffffffffff2 R14: ffff88810af408c8 R15: ffff8881070c3600 FS: 00007faaaf364fc0(0000) GS:ffff88842fdc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000000000e0 CR3: 00000001097b1000 CR4: 0000000000350ea0 Call Trace: ioc_weight_write+0x13d/0x410 cgroup_file_write+0x7a/0x130 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf5/0x170 vfs_write+0x298/0x370 ksys_write+0x5f/0xb0 __x64_sys_write+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

This happens because iocg->ioc is NULL. The field is initialized by ioc_pd_init() and never cleared. The NULL deref is caused by blkcg_activate_policy() installing blkg_policy_data before initializing it.

blkcg_activate_policy() was doing the following:

  • Allocate pd's for all existing blkg's and install them in blkg->pd[].
  • Initialize all pd's.
  • Online all pd's.

blkcg_activate_policy() only grabs the queue_lock and may release and re-acquire the lock as allocation may need to sleep. ioc_weight_write() grabs blkcg->lock and iterates all its blkg's. The two can race and if ioc_weight_write() runs during #1 or between #1 and #2, it can encounter a pd which is not initialized yet, leading to crash.

The crash can be reproduced with the following script:

#!/bin/bash

echo +io > /sys/fs/cgroup/cgroup.subtree_control systemd-run --unit touch-sda --scope dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1 iflag=direct echo 100 > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/io.weight bash -c "echo '8:0 enable=1' > /sys/fs/cgroup/io.cost.qos" & sleep .2 echo 100 > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/io.weight

with the following patch applied:

> diff --git a/block/blk-cgroup.c b/block/blk-cgroup.c > index fc49be622e05..38d671d5e10c 100644 > --- a/block/blk-cgroup.c > +++ b/block/blk-cgroup.c > @@ -1553,6 +1553,12 @@ int blkcg_activate_policy(struct gendisk *disk, const struct blkcg_policy *pol) > pd->online = false; > } > > + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) { > + spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); > + ssleep(1); > + spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); > + } > + > /* all allocated, init in the same order */ > if (pol->pd_init_fn) > list_for_each_entry_reverse(blkg, &q->blkg_list, q_node)

I don't see a reason why all pd's should be allocated, initialized and onlined together. The only ordering requirement is that parent blkgs to be initialized and onlined before children, which is guaranteed from the walking order. Let's fix the bug by allocating, initializing and onlining pd for each blkg and holding blkcg->lock over initialization and onlining. This ensures that an installed blkg is always fully initialized and onlined removing the the race window.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
11th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

December 30, 2025

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-54271(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-503.11.1.el9_52024-11-12redhat
linuxKernel @ 6.4.16 (fixes >=5.4.0)—osv
linuxKernel @ 5.15.210 (fixes >=5.4.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (499 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.176-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.5.3-1: fixed in 6.5.3-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.5.3-1: fixed in 6.5.3-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 94 of 229 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 135 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-01 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-10-31 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  4. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  5. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-10-27 16:55 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-25 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  13. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  14. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  16. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 07:39 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-17 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  20. 2026-10-16 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  21. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  22. 2026-10-15 02:14 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-15 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw53-vfm2-vf66
  24. 2026-10-15 01:25 UTCNVD update
  25. 2026-10-15 00:21 UTCVendor advisory
Show 69 more
  1. 2026-10-15 00:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw53-vfm2-vf66
  2. 2026-10-15 00:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  3. 2026-10-14 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  4. 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 14:25 UTCOSV refresh
  12. 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  19. 2026-09-30 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  25. 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  26. 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  27. 2026-09-19 21:33 UTCOSV refresh
  28. 2026-09-18 19:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  29. 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  31. 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  32. 2026-09-13 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  33. 2026-09-12 14:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  34. 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  35. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  36. 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  37. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  38. 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  39. 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  40. 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  41. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  42. 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  43. 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  44. 2026-09-01 04:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  45. 2026-09-01 01:04 UTCOSV refresh
  46. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  48. 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  49. 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  50. 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  51. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  52. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  53. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  54. 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  55. 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  56. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  57. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  58. 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  59. 2026-08-15 01:03 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-15 01:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw53-vfm2-vf66
  61. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  62. 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  63. 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-08-10 23:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  65. 2026-08-09 22:20 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-09 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jw53-vfm2-vf66
  67. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  69. 2026-08-07 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2023-54271?
CVE-2023-54271 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on December 30, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: blk-cgroup: Fix NULL deref caused by blkg_policy_data being installed before init blk-iocost sometimes causes the following crash: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000e0 ... RIP:…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-54271 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-54271 was published on December 30, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-54271 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-54271 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (11th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-54271?
A fix for CVE-2023-54271 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-54271 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-54271

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-54271?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.