In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
powerpc/iommu: Fix notifiers being shared by PCI and VIO buses
fail_iommu_setup() registers the fail_iommu_bus_notifier struct to both
PCI and VIO buses. struct notifier_block is a linked list node, so this
causes any notifiers later registered to either bus type to also be
registered to the other since they share the same node.
This causes issues in (at least) the vgaarb code, which registers a
notifier for PCI buses. pci_notify() ends up being called on a vio
device, converted with to_pci_dev() even though it's not a PCI device,
and finally makes a bad access in vga_arbiter_add_pci_device() as
discovered with KASAN:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in vga_arbiter_add_pci_device+0x60/0xe00
Read of size 4 at addr c000000264c26fdc by task swapper/0/1
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x1bc/0x2b8 (unreliable)
print_report+0x3f4/0xc60
kasan_report+0x244/0x698
__asan_load4+0xe8/0x250
vga_arbiter_add_pci_device+0x60/0xe00
pci_notify+0x88/0x444
notifier_call_chain+0x104/0x320
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xa0/0x140
device_add+0xac8/0x1d30
device_register+0x58/0x80
vio_register_device_node+0x9ac/0xce0
vio_bus_scan_register_devices+0xc4/0x13c
__machine_initcall_pseries_vio_device_init+0x94/0xf0
do_one_initcall+0x12c/0xaa8
kernel_init_freeable+0xa48/0xba8
kernel_init+0x64/0x400
ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64
Fix this by creating separate notifier_block structs for each bus type.
[mpe: Add #ifdef to fix CONFIG_IBMVIO=n build]
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.0 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it