CVE-2023-53489

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-10-01. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tcp/udp: Fix memleaks of sk and zerocopy skbs with TX timestamp.

syzkaller reported [0] memory leaks of an UDP socket and ZEROCOPY skbs. We can reproduce the problem with these sequences:

sk = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0) sk.setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_TIMESTAMPING, SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE) sk.setsockopt(SOL_SOCKET, SO_ZEROCOPY, 1) sk.sendto(b'', MSG_ZEROCOPY, ('127.0.0.1', 53)) sk.close()

sendmsg() calls msg_zerocopy_alloc(), which allocates a skb, sets skb->cb->ubuf.refcnt to 1, and calls sock_hold(). Here, struct ubuf_info_msgzc indirectly holds a refcnt of the socket. When the skb is sent, __skb_tstamp_tx() clones it and puts the clone into the socket's error queue with the TX timestamp.

When the original skb is received locally, skb_copy_ubufs() calls skb_unclone(), and pskb_expand_head() increments skb->cb->ubuf.refcnt. This additional count is decremented while freeing the skb, but struct ubuf_info_msgzc still has a refcnt, so __msg_zerocopy_callback() is not called.

The last refcnt is not released unless we retrieve the TX timestamped skb by recvmsg(). Since we clear the error queue in inet_sock_destruct() after the socket's refcnt reaches 0, there is a circular dependency. If we close() the socket holding such skbs, we never call sock_put() and leak the count, sk, and skb.

TCP has the same problem, and commit e0c8bccd40fc ("net: stream: purge sk_error_queue in sk_stream_kill_queues()") tried to fix it by calling skb_queue_purge() during close(). However, there is a small chance that skb queued in a qdisc or device could be put into the error queue after the skb_queue_purge() call.

In __skb_tstamp_tx(), the cloned skb should not have a reference to the ubuf to remove the circular dependency, but skb_clone() does not call skb_copy_ubufs() for zerocopy skb. So, we need to call skb_orphan_frags_rx() for the cloned skb to call skb_copy_ubufs().

[0]: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88800c6d2d00 (size 1152): comm "syz-executor392", pid 264, jiffies 4294785440 (age 13.044s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 cd af e8 81 00 00 00 00 ................ 02 00 07 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ...@............ backtrace: [<0000000055636812>] sk_prot_alloc+0x64/0x2a0 net/core/sock.c:2024 [<0000000054d77b7a>] sk_alloc+0x3b/0x800 net/core/sock.c:2083 [<0000000066f3c7e0>] inet_create net/ipv4/af_inet.c:319 [inline] [<0000000066f3c7e0>] inet_create+0x31e/0xe40 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:245 [<000000009b83af97>] __sock_create+0x2ab/0x550 net/socket.c:1515 [<00000000b9b11231>] sock_create net/socket.c:1566 [inline] [<00000000b9b11231>] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1603 [inline] [<00000000b9b11231>] __sys_socket_create net/socket.c:1588 [inline] [<00000000b9b11231>] __sys_socket+0x138/0x250 net/socket.c:1636 [<000000004fb45142>] __do_sys_socket net/socket.c:1649 [inline] [<000000004fb45142>] __se_sys_socket net/socket.c:1647 [inline] [<000000004fb45142>] __x64_sys_socket+0x73/0xb0 net/socket.c:1647 [<0000000066999e0e>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] [<0000000066999e0e>] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 [<0000000017f238c1>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff888017633a00 (size 240): comm "syz-executor392", pid 264, jiffies 4294785440 (age 13.044s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2d 6d 0c 80 88 ff ff .........-m..... backtrace: [<000000002b1c4368>] __alloc_skb+0x229/0x320 net/core/skbuff.c:497 [<00000000143579a6>] alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1265 [inline] [<00000000143579a6>] sock_omalloc+0xaa/0x190 net/core/sock.c:2596 [<00000000be626478>] msg_zerocopy_alloc net/core/skbuff.c:1294 [inline] [<00000000be626478>] ---truncated---

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
EPSS
4.5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

October 1, 2025

Last Modified

January 21, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-53489(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-362.8.1.el9_32023-11-07redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 63 more
  1. 2026-07-06 13:31 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-06 02:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-18 01:35 UTCOSV refresh
  30. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-29 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-05-29 21:45 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-05-29 21:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53489?
CVE-2023-53489 is a medium vulnerability published on October 1, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp/udp: Fix memleaks of sk and zerocopy skbs with TX timestamp. syzkaller reported [0] memory leaks of an UDP socket and ZEROCOPY skbs. We can reproduce the problem with these sequences: sk = socket(AFINET, SOCKDGRAM, 0)…
When was CVE-2023-53489 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53489 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on October 1, 2025, with the most recent update on January 21, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53489 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53489 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 4.5% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53489?
CVE-2023-53489 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53489?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53489, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53489

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53489?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.