In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: don't reset unchangable mount option in f2fs_remount()
syzbot reports a bug as below:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000009: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x69/0x2000 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4942
Call Trace:
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
__raw_write_lock include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:209 [inline]
_raw_write_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:300
__drop_extent_tree+0x3ac/0x660 fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c:1100
f2fs_drop_extent_tree+0x17/0x30 fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c:1116
f2fs_insert_range+0x2d5/0x3c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1664
f2fs_fallocate+0x4e4/0x6d0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1838
vfs_fallocate+0x54b/0x6b0 fs/open.c:324
ksys_fallocate fs/open.c:347 [inline]
__do_sys_fallocate fs/open.c:355 [inline]
__se_sys_fallocate fs/open.c:353 [inline]
__x64_sys_fallocate+0xbd/0x100 fs/open.c:353
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The root cause is race condition as below:
- since it tries to remount rw filesystem, so that do_remount won't
call sb_prepare_remount_readonly to block fallocate, there may be race
condition in between remount and fallocate.
- in f2fs_remount(), default_options() will reset mount option to default
one, and then update it based on result of parse_options(), so there is
a hole which race condition can happen.
Thread A Thread B
- f2fs_fill_super
- parse_options
- clear_opt(READ_EXTENT_CACHE)
- f2fs_remount
- default_options
- set_opt(READ_EXTENT_CACHE)
- f2fs_fallocate
- f2fs_insert_range
- f2fs_drop_extent_tree
- __drop_extent_tree
- __may_extent_tree
- test_opt(READ_EXTENT_CACHE) return true
- write_lock(&et->lock) access NULL pointer
- parse_options
- clear_opt(READ_EXTENT_CACHE)
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it