CVE-2023-53382

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-09-18. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails.

We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. It can be reproduced by:

  • smc_run nginx
  • smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://:

BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 8000000108713067 P4D 8000000108713067 PUD 151127067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 4 PID: 2441 Comm: kworker/4:249 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W E 6.4.0-rc1+ #42 Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc] RIP: 0010:smc_clc_send_confirm_accept+0x284/0x580 [smc] RSP: 0018:ffffb8294b2d7c78 EFLAGS: 00010a06 RAX: ffff8f1873238880 RBX: ffffb8294b2d7dc8 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000000000b4 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000b40c00 RBP: ffffb8294b2d7db8 R08: ffff8f1815c5860c R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f1846f56180 R13: ffff8f1815c5860c R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f1aefd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000014 CR3: 00000001027a0001 CR4: 00000000003706e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ? mlx5_ib_map_mr_sg+0xa1/0xd0 [mlx5_ib] ? smcr_buf_map_link+0x24b/0x290 [smc] ? __smc_buf_create+0x4ee/0x9b0 [smc] smc_clc_send_accept+0x4c/0xb0 [smc] smc_listen_work+0x346/0x650 [smc] ? __schedule+0x279/0x820 process_one_work+0x1e5/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x2f0 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe5/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50

During the CLC handshake, server sequentially tries available SMCRv2 and SMCRv1 devices in smc_listen_work().

If an SMCRv2 device is found. SMCv2 based link group and link will be assigned to the connection. Then assumed that some buffer assignment errors happen later in the CLC handshake, such as RMB registration failure, server will give up SMCRv2 and try SMCRv1 device instead. But the resources assigned to the connection won't be reset.

When server tries SMCRv1 device, the connection creation process will be executed again. Since conn->lnk has been assigned when trying SMCRv2, it will not be set to the correct SMCRv1 link in smcr_lgr_conn_assign_link(). So in such situation, conn->lgr points to correct SMCRv1 link group but conn->lnk points to the SMCRv2 link mistakenly.

Then in smc_clc_send_confirm_accept(), conn->rmb_desc->mr[link->link_idx] will be accessed. Since the link->link_idx is not correct, the related MR may not have been initialized, so crash happens.

| Try SMCRv2 device first | |-> conn->lgr: assign existed SMCRv2 link group; | |-> conn->link: assign existed SMCRv2 link (link_idx may be 1 in SMC_LGR_SYMMETRIC); | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation fails, quit; | | Try SMCRv1 device then | |-> conn->lgr: create SMCRv1 link group and assign; | |-> conn->link: keep SMCRv2 link mistakenly; | |-> sndbuf & RMB creation succeed, only RMB->mr[link_idx = 0] | initialized. | | Then smc_clc_send_confirm_accept() accesses | conn->rmb_desc->mr[conn->link->link_idx, which is 1], then crash. v

This patch tries to fix this by cleaning conn->lnk before assigning link. In addition, it is better to reset the connection and clean the resources assigned if trying SMCRv2 failed in buffer creation or registration.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 18, 2025

Last Modified

January 14, 2026

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.1.31osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 19:41 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 02:29 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 66 more
  1. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 14:01 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-18 02:14 UTCOSV refresh
  36. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-29 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-05-29 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53382?
CVE-2023-53382 is a medium vulnerability published on September 18, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/smc: Reset connection when trying to use SMCRv2 fails. We found a crash when using SMCRv2 with 2 Mellanox ConnectX-4. It can be reproduced by: smc_run nginx smc_run wrk -t 32 -c 500 -d 30 http://<ip>:<port> BUG: kernel NULL…
When was CVE-2023-53382 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53382 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 18, 2025, with the most recent update on January 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53382 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53382 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53382?
CVE-2023-53382 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53382?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53382, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53382

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53382?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.