CVE-2023-53087

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-05-02. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/i915/active: Fix misuse of non-idle barriers as fence trackers

Users reported oopses on list corruptions when using i915 perf with a number of concurrently running graphics applications. Root cause analysis pointed at an issue in barrier processing code -- a race among perf open / close replacing active barriers with perf requests on kernel context and concurrent barrier preallocate / acquire operations performed during user context first pin / last unpin.

When adding a request to a composite tracker, we try to reuse an existing fence tracker, already allocated and registered with that composite. The tracker we obtain may already track another fence, may be an idle barrier, or an active barrier.

If the tracker we get occurs a non-idle barrier then we try to delete that barrier from a list of barrier tasks it belongs to. However, while doing that we don't respect return value from a function that performs the barrier deletion. Should the deletion ever fail, we would end up reusing the tracker still registered as a barrier task. Since the same structure field is reused with both fence callback lists and barrier tasks list, list corruptions would likely occur.

Barriers are now deleted from a barrier tasks list by temporarily removing the list content, traversing that content with skip over the node to be deleted, then populating the list back with the modified content. Should that intentionally racy concurrent deletion attempts be not serialized, one or more of those may fail because of the list being temporary empty.

Related code that ignores the results of barrier deletion was initially introduced in v5.4 by commit d8af05ff38ae ("drm/i915: Allow sharing the idle-barrier from other kernel requests"). However, all users of the barrier deletion routine were apparently serialized at that time, then the issue didn't exhibit itself. Results of git bisect with help of a newly developed igt@gem_barrier_race@remote-request IGT test indicate that list corruptions might start to appear after commit 311770173fac ("drm/i915/gt: Schedule request retirement when timeline idles"), introduced in v5.5.

Respect results of barrier deletion attempts -- mark the barrier as idle only if successfully deleted from the list. Then, before proceeding with setting our fence as the one currently tracked, make sure that the tracker we've got is not a non-idle barrier. If that check fails then don't use that tracker but go back and try to acquire a new, usable one.

v3: use unlikely() to document what outcome we expect (Andi),

  • fix bad grammar in commit description.
v2: no code changes,
  • blame commit 311770173fac ("drm/i915/gt: Schedule request retirement
when timeline idles"), v5.5, not commit d8af05ff38ae ("drm/i915: Allow sharing the idle-barrier from other kernel requests"), v5.4,
  • reword commit description.

(cherry picked from commit 506006055769b10d1b2b4e22f636f3b45e0e9fc7)

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
EPSS
6.6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 2, 2025

Last Modified

November 12, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-53087(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-513.5.1.el8_92023-11-14redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-362.8.1.el9_32023-11-07redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-22 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-07 13:45 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-07 02:51 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 57 more
  1. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-01 15:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-18 13:44 UTCOSV refresh
  26. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-12 23:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-07 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-05-30 06:16 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-05-30 06:16 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-05-30 06:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-53087?
CVE-2023-53087 is a medium vulnerability published on May 2, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/i915/active: Fix misuse of non-idle barriers as fence trackers Users reported oopses on list corruptions when using i915 perf with a number of concurrently running graphics applications. Root cause analysis pointed at an issue…
When was CVE-2023-53087 disclosed?
CVE-2023-53087 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 2, 2025, with the most recent update on November 12, 2025. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-53087 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-53087 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 6.6% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-53087?
CVE-2023-53087 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-53087?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-53087, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2023-53087

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-53087?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.