CVE-2023-34450

LOWNVD 3.73.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.9%, top 46% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
3.7
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 1%CVSS: 3.7Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

CometBFT is a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) middleware that takes a state transition machine and replicates it on many machines. An internal modification made in versions 0.34.28 and 0.37.1 to the way struct PeerState is serialized to JSON introduced a deadlock when new function MarshallJSON is called. This function can be called from two places. The first is via logs, setting the consensus logging module to "debug" level (should not happen in production), and setting the log output format to JSON. The second is via RPC dump_consensus_state.

Case 1, which should not be hit in production, will eventually hit the deadlock in most goroutines, effectively halting the node.

In case 2, only the data structures related to the first peer will be deadlocked, together with the thread(s) dealing with the RPC request(s). This means that only one of the channels of communication to the node's peers will be blocked. Eventually the peer will timeout and excluded from the list (typically after 2 minutes). The goroutines involved in the deadlock will not be garbage collected, but they will not interfere with the system after the peer is excluded.

The theoretical worst case for case 2, is a network with only two validator nodes. In this case, each of the nodes only has one PeerState struct. If dump_consensus_state is called in either node (or both), the chain will halt until the peer connections time out, after which the nodes will reconnect (with different PeerState structs) and the chain will progress again. Then, the same process can be repeated.

As the number of nodes in a network increases, and thus, the number of peer struct each node maintains, the possibility of reproducing the perturbation visible with two nodes decreases. Only the first PeerState struct will deadlock, and not the others (RPC dump_consensus_state accesses them in a for loop, so the deadlock at the first iteration causes the rest of the iterations of that "for" loop to never be reached).

This regression was fixed in versions 0.34.29 and 0.37.2. Some workarounds are available. For case 1 (hitting the deadlock via logs), either don't set the log output to "json", leave at "plain", or don't set the consensus logging module to "debug", leave it at "info" or higher. For case 2 (hitting the deadlock via RPC dump_consensus_state), do not expose dump_consensus_state RPC endpoint to the public internet (e.g., via rules in one's nginx setup).

CVSS v3
3.7
EG Score
3.7(medium)
EG Risk
17(Track)
EG Risk 17/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity37% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
54.4%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 3, 2023

Last Modified

November 21, 2024

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
github.com/cometbft/cometbft0.37.2

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 53× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 114 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-16 17:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 16:49 UTCOSV refresh
  19. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-06 16:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-05 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-02 16:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-29 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-28 04:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-27 17:04 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-11 13:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-10 22:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-10 03:47 UTCOSV refresh
  56. 2026-06-08 14:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-34450?
CVE-2023-34450 is a low vulnerability published on July 3, 2023. CometBFT is a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) middleware that takes a state transition machine and replicates it on many machines. An internal modification made in versions 0.34.28 and 0.37.1 to the way struct PeerState is serialized to JSON introduced a deadlock when new function MarshallJSON is…
When was CVE-2023-34450 disclosed?
CVE-2023-34450 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 3, 2023, with the most recent update on November 21, 2024. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2023-34450 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-34450 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 54.4% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-34450?
CVE-2023-34450 has a CVSS v3 base score of 3.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-34450?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2023-34450, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-34450

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-34450?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.