CVE-2023-26253

CRITICALNVD 7.59.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2023-02-21. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 1.6.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2023-30077 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.9%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In Gluster GlusterFS 11.0, there is an xlators/mount/fuse/src/fuse-bridge.c notify stack-based buffer over-read.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
72
EG Risk 72/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.9%
EPSS %ILE
60th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

February 21, 2023

Last Modified

March 14, 2025

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

[SECURITY] Fedora 37 Update: glusterfs-10.4-1.fc37 - package-announce - Fedora mailing-lists

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UE6K2DXP4QZVKP32Z7BSYDSRBL4H7JSE/
Web page

AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow in notify at glusterfs/xlators/mount/fuse/src/fuse-bridge.c · Issue #3954 · gluster/glusterfs · GitHub

https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/3954

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2023-26253(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuglusterfs-cli (10.2-1ubuntu0.1) @ kinetic2026-11-02ubuntu
ubuntuglusterfs-common (3.7.6-1ubuntu1+esm2) @ xenial2026-11-02ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
glusterfs10.0-1 ... 9.4-2~bpo11+1 (39 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
glusterfs—
  • every version up to 10.3-5: fixed in 10.3-5
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
glusterfs—
  • every version up to 10.3-5: fixed in 10.3-5
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
glusterfs—
  • every version up to 10.3-5: fixed in 10.3-5
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 89× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 269 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 169 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-11-02 19:36 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-02 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-11-02 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  5. 2026-11-01 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-01 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-01 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  9. 2026-10-31 17:45 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-31 17:45 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-31 17:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-30 16:48 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-30 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  18. 2026-10-29 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-29 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-29 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  21. 2026-10-28 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-28 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-28 14:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-10-27 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 13:41 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-27 13:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  3. 2026-10-26 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-10-25 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 11:14 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-25 11:14 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-25 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  9. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  10. 2026-10-24 10:18 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 10:18 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-24 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  13. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  14. 2026-10-23 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-23 09:22 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-23 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  17. 2026-10-22 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 08:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-22 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-22 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  21. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  22. 2026-10-21 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-21 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-21 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  26. 2026-10-20 06:34 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-20 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-20 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  29. 2026-10-19 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  30. 2026-10-19 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-10-19 05:36 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-19 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  33. 2026-10-18 04:40 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-18 04:40 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-18 04:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  36. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  37. 2026-10-17 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-17 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-17 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  40. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  41. 2026-10-16 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-16 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-16 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  44. 2026-10-15 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  45. 2026-10-14 22:45 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-10-14 22:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  47. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  48. 2026-10-13 18:23 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-13 18:23 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-13 18:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  51. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  52. 2026-10-12 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-12 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-12 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-696f-v7g7-q758 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  55. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  56. 2026-10-11 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  58. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  59. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  60. 2026-10-08 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  61. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  62. 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  63. 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  64. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  65. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  66. 2026-10-02 16:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  67. 2026-10-01 19:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  68. 2026-09-30 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  70. 2026-09-29 15:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  71. 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  72. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  73. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  74. 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  75. 2026-09-23 20:11 UTCOSV refresh

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2023-26253?
CVE-2023-26253 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on February 21, 2023. In Gluster GlusterFS 11.0, there is an xlators/mount/fuse/src/fuse-bridge.c notify stack-based buffer over-read.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2023-26253 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2023-26253 was published on February 21, 2023. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of March 14, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2023-26253 actively exploited?
CVE-2023-26253 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (60th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2023-26253?
CVE-2023-26253 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 9.1 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2023-26253?
A fix for CVE-2023-26253 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2023-26253 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2023-26253

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2023-26253?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.