CVE-2022-50661

NONECVSS 0.0
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

seccomp: Move copy_seccomp() to no failure path.

Our syzbot instance reported memory leaks in do_seccomp() [0], similar to the report [1]. It shows that we miss freeing struct seccomp_filter and some objects included in it.

We can reproduce the issue with the program below [2] which calls one seccomp() and two clone() syscalls.

The first clone()d child exits earlier than its parent and sends a signal to kill it during the second clone(), more precisely before the fatal_signal_pending() test in copy_process(). When the parent receives the signal, it has to destroy the embryonic process and return -EINTR to user space. In the failure path, we have to call seccomp_filter_release() to decrement the filter's refcount.

Initially, we called it in free_task() called from the failure path, but the commit 3a15fb6ed92c ("seccomp: release filter after task is fully dead") moved it to release_task() to notify user space as early as possible that the filter is no longer used.

To keep the change and current seccomp refcount semantics, let's move copy_seccomp() just after the signal check and add a WARN_ON_ONCE() in free_task() for future debugging.

[0]: unreferenced object 0xffff8880063add00 (size 256): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.914s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ backtrace: do_seccomp (./include/linux/slab.h:600 ./include/linux/slab.h:733 kernel/seccomp.c:666 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) unreferenced object 0xffffc90000035000 (size 4096): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: __vmalloc_node_range (mm/vmalloc.c:3226) __vmalloc_node (mm/vmalloc.c:3261 (discriminator 4)) bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats (kernel/bpf/core.c:91) bpf_prog_alloc (kernel/bpf/core.c:129) bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1414) do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) unreferenced object 0xffff888003fa1000 (size 1024): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats (./include/linux/slab.h:600 ./include/linux/slab.h:733 kernel/bpf/core.c:95) bpf_prog_alloc (kernel/bpf/core.c:129) bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1414) do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) unreferenced object 0xffff888006360240 (size 16): comm "repro_seccomp", pid 230, jiffies 4294687090 (age 9.915s) hex dump (first 16 bytes): 01 00 37 00 76 65 72 6c e0 83 01 06 80 88 ff ff ..7.verl........ backtrace: bpf_prog_store_orig_filter (net/core/filter.c:1137) bpf_prog_create_from_user (net/core/filter.c:1428) do_seccomp (kernel/seccomp.c:671 kernel/seccomp.c:708 kernel/seccomp.c:1871 kernel/seccomp.c:1991) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120) unreferenced object 0xffff888 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EG Risk
0
EG Risk 0/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. It is distinct from the 0–10 EG Score, which measures severity.

EPSS
11.8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

December 9, 2025

Last Modified

April 15, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-50661(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_22023-09-12redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.10.180osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 134 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-23 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-22 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-20 17:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-19 14:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-19 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-16 17:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-15 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-12 05:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-11 08:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-10 00:17 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-07-09 19:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-08 15:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-07 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 02:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-05 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-04 06:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-01 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-30 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-30 23:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-29 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-28 04:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-27 03:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-23 21:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-22 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-21 14:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-21 11:01 UTCOSV refresh
  28. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-21 01:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-19 19:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-18 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-17 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-16 17:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-15 17:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-14 23:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-13 22:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-12 23:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-11 13:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-10 13:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-08 14:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-07 15:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-05 22:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-05 06:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-04 13:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-02 20:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-02 02:39 UTCOSV refresh
  61. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-01 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-31 22:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-31 00:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-29 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-28 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-27 13:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-05-26 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-26 07:17 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2022-50661?
CVE-2022-50661 is a none vulnerability published on December 9, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: seccomp: Move copy_seccomp() to no failure path. Our syzbot instance reported memory leaks in do_seccomp() [0], similar to the report [1]. It shows that we miss freeing struct seccomp_filter and some objects included in it. We can…
When was CVE-2022-50661 disclosed?
CVE-2022-50661 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on December 9, 2025, with the most recent update on April 15, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2022-50661 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-50661 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 11.8% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
How do I remediate CVE-2022-50661?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2022-50661, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2022-50661

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-50661?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.