In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
IB/mad: Don't call to function that might sleep while in atomic context
Tracepoints are not allowed to sleep, as such the following splat is
generated due to call to ib_query_pkey() in atomic context.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1888000 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:2492 rb_commit+0xc1/0x220
CPU: 0 PID: 1888000 Comm: kworker/u9:0 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE --------- - - 4.18.0-305.3.1.el8.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module_el8.3.0+555+a55c8938 04/01/2014
Workqueue: ib-comp-unb-wq ib_cq_poll_work [ib_core]
RIP: 0010:rb_commit+0xc1/0x220
RSP: 0000:ffffa8ac80f9bca0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: ffff8951c7c01300 RBX: ffff8951c7c14a00 RCX: 0000000000000246
RDX: ffff8951c707c000 RSI: ffff8951c707c57c RDI: ffff8951c7c14a00
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff8951c7c01300 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000246
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffffffff964c70c0 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8951fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f20e8f39010 CR3: 000000002ca10005 CR4: 0000000000170ef0
Call Trace:
ring_buffer_unlock_commit+0x1d/0xa0
trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x3b/0x1b0
trace_event_buffer_commit+0x67/0x1d0
trace_event_raw_event_ib_mad_recv_done_handler+0x11c/0x160 [ib_core]
ib_mad_recv_done+0x48b/0xc10 [ib_core]
? trace_event_raw_event_cq_poll+0x6f/0xb0 [ib_core]
__ib_process_cq+0x91/0x1c0 [ib_core]
ib_cq_poll_work+0x26/0x80 [ib_core]
process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360
? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
worker_thread+0x30/0x390
? create_worker+0x1a0/0x1a0
kthread+0x116/0x130
? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
---[ end trace 78ba8509d3830a16 ]---
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it