In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
led: qcom-lpg: Fix sleeping in atomic
lpg_brighness_set() function can sleep, while led's brightness_set()
callback must be non-blocking. Change LPG driver to use
brightness_set_blocking() instead.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
preempt_count: 101, expected: 0
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 6.1.0-rc1-00014-gbe99b089c6fc-dirty #85
Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. DB820c (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace.part.0+0xe4/0xf0
show_stack+0x18/0x40
dump_stack_lvl+0x88/0xb4
dump_stack+0x18/0x34
__might_resched+0x170/0x254
__might_sleep+0x48/0x9c
__mutex_lock+0x4c/0x400
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x40
lpg_brightness_single_set+0x40/0x90
led_set_brightness_nosleep+0x34/0x60
led_heartbeat_function+0x80/0x170
call_timer_fn+0xb8/0x340
__run_timers.part.0+0x20c/0x254
run_timer_softirq+0x3c/0x7c
_stext+0x14c/0x578
____do_softirq+0x10/0x20
call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x5c
do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30
__irq_exit_rcu+0x164/0x170
irq_exit_rcu+0x10/0x40
el1_interrupt+0x38/0x50
el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x2c
el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
cpuidle_enter_state+0xc8/0x380
cpuidle_enter+0x38/0x50
do_idle+0x244/0x2d0
cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x30
rest_init+0x128/0x1a0
arch_post_acpi_subsys_init+0x0/0x18
start_kernel+0x6f4/0x734
__primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it