CVE-2022-49943

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2025-06-18. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2022-55225 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6cpq-cwgw-5g63 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

USB: gadget: Fix obscure lockdep violation for udc_mutex

A recent commit expanding the scope of the udc_lock mutex in the gadget core managed to cause an obscure and slightly bizarre lockdep violation. In abbreviated form:

====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.19.0-rc7+ #12510 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ udevadm/312 is trying to acquire lock: ffff80000aae1058 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0

but task is already holding lock: ffff000002277548 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x34/0xe0

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (kn->active#4){++++}-{0:0}:        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84        __kernfs_remove+0x268/0x380        kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x58/0xac        sysfs_remove_file_ns+0x18/0x24        device_del+0x15c/0x440

-> #2 (device_links_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64        device_link_remove+0x3c/0xa0        _regulator_put.part.0+0x168/0x190        regulator_put+0x3c/0x54        devm_regulator_release+0x14/0x20

-> #1 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64        regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x284        regulator_enable+0x34/0x80        phy_power_on+0x24/0x130        __dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x100/0x130        dwc2_lowlevel_hw_enable+0x18/0x40        dwc2_hsotg_udc_start+0x6c/0x2f0        gadget_bind_driver+0x124/0x1f4

-> #0 (udc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:        __lock_acquire+0x1298/0x20cc        lock_acquire.part.0+0xe0/0x230        lock_acquire+0x68/0x84        __mutex_lock+0x9c/0x430        mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x64        usb_udc_uevent+0x54/0xe0

Evidently this was caused by the scope of udc_mutex being too large. The mutex is only meant to protect udc->driver along with a few other things. As far as I can tell, there's no reason for the mutex to be held while the gadget core calls a gadget driver's ->bind or ->unbind routine, or while a UDC is being started or stopped. (This accounts for link #1 in the chain above, where the mutex is held while the dwc2_hsotg_udc is started as part of driver probing.)

Gadget drivers' ->disconnect callbacks are problematic. Even though usb_gadget_disconnect() will now acquire the udc_mutex, there's a window in usb_gadget_bind_driver() between the times when the mutex is released and the ->bind callback is invoked. If a disconnect occurred during that window, we could call the driver's ->disconnect routine before its ->bind routine. To prevent this from happening, it will be necessary to prevent a UDC from connecting while it has no gadget driver. This should be done already but it doesn't seem to be; currently usb_gadget_connect() has no check for this. Such a check will have to be added later.

Some degree of mutual exclusion is required in soft_connect_store(), which can dereference udc->driver at arbitrary times since it is a sysfs callback. The solution here is to acquire the gadget's device lock rather than the udc_mutex. Since the driver core guarantees that the device lock is always held during driver binding and unbinding, this will make the accesses in soft_connect_store() mutually exclusive with any changes to udc->driver.

Lastly, it turns out there is one place which should hold the udc_mutex but currently does not: The function_show() routine needs protection while it dereferences udc->driver. The missing lock and unlock calls are added.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 18, 2025

Last Modified

November 14, 2025

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2022-49943(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.11.1.el9_22023-05-09redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.19.8 (fixes >=5.19.7)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.2-1: fixed in 6.0.2-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.2-1: fixed in 6.0.2-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux—
  • every version up to 6.0.2-1: fixed in 6.0.2-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 188 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 91 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-02 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-10-30 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 17:54 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-25 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-10-24 17:46 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-24 17:46 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-24 17:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6cpq-cwgw-5g63 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  14. 2026-10-24 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  15. 2026-10-23 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  16. 2026-10-22 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  17. 2026-10-21 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-10-20 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-19 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-10-15 16:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-10-14 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 18:41 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  4. 2026-10-11 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-10-10 19:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  8. 2026-10-07 23:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-10-06 15:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-10-05 17:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  11. 2026-10-04 23:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  12. 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  13. 2026-10-02 11:11 UTCOSV refresh
  14. 2026-09-30 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-09-27 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  17. 2026-09-26 15:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  18. 2026-09-26 00:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-09-24 14:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  20. 2026-09-23 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  21. 2026-09-20 20:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 14:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  23. 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  24. 2026-09-15 03:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-09-13 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  26. 2026-09-13 09:24 UTCOSV refresh
  27. 2026-09-11 14:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  28. 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  29. 2026-09-08 21:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  30. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  31. 2026-09-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  32. 2026-09-05 15:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  33. 2026-09-04 13:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  34. 2026-09-04 05:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  35. 2026-09-02 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  36. 2026-09-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  37. 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  38. 2026-08-30 01:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  39. 2026-08-28 21:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  40. 2026-08-27 14:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  41. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  42. 2026-08-25 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  43. 2026-08-25 10:11 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  45. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  46. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  47. 2026-08-19 17:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  48. 2026-08-18 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  49. 2026-08-17 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  50. 2026-08-16 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  51. 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  52. 2026-08-15 01:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  53. 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  54. 2026-08-12 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  55. 2026-08-09 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  56. 2026-08-09 02:52 UTCOSV refresh
  57. 2026-08-08 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  58. 2026-08-07 16:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  59. 2026-08-06 13:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  60. 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  61. 2026-08-04 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  62. 2026-08-03 10:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  63. 2026-08-02 02:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  64. 2026-08-01 04:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  65. 2026-07-30 16:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  66. 2026-07-30 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  67. 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  68. 2026-07-26 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  69. 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  70. 2026-07-24 14:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  71. 2026-07-24 03:11 UTCOSV refresh
  72. 2026-07-23 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2022-49943?
CVE-2022-49943 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 18, 2025. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: USB: gadget: Fix obscure lockdep violation for udc_mutex A recent commit expanding the scope of the udc_lock mutex in the gadget core managed to cause an obscure and slightly bizarre lockdep violation. In abbreviated form:…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2022-49943 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2022-49943 was published on June 18, 2025. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 14, 2025; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2022-49943 actively exploited?
CVE-2022-49943 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2022-49943?
CVE-2022-49943 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2022-49943?
A fix for CVE-2022-49943 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2022-49943 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2022-49943

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2022-49943?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.